A list showing the names of all other witnesses, preceding as well as subsequent, and the respective page numbers will appear in that part of the publication which covers the end of the Defence phase.
The case for ROSENBERG (concluded):
Oral evidence of defendant Rosenberg, given on 16. and
17.4.46 (Day 109 and 110):
on Attitude to Church, Einsatzstab Rosenberg, Its seizure of
Jewish property in France, Its activities in the Baltic
States and Poland;
His scope and activities as Minister for the Eastern
Occupied Territories, Forced labour, Friction with Reich
Commissioner Koch;
Treatment of prisoners of war, Concentration camps, Jews.
Examined on 16. and 17.4.46 by Counsel for other defendants
(Days 109 & 110).
Witnesses:
Oral evidence given on 17.4.46 (Day 110):
by Hans Joachim Riecke, Head of Food and Agriculture
Division in defendant's Ministry on:
Scope of various offices for Eastern administration,
Defendant's agrarian policy in the Baltic States, His
attitude to Eastern peoples.
Oral evidence given in Part 11
By Dr. Hans H. Lammers:
on:
Scope of various offices for Eastern administration;
His attitude to Eastern peoples.
Examined by Counsel for other defendants
The case for FRANK.
Oral evidence of defendant Frank:
On Positions in Party and State, Admission of guilt,
His responsibilities as Governor-General of occupied Poland:
Extent and limitations of his position, Annihilation of
Jews, Maidanek concentration camp, Warsaw Ghetto, Repression
of Resistance movement, A.B. (Extraordinary Pacification)
action, Warsaw uprising of 1944, Forced Labour;
Attitude to Church, to Poland's cultural life, Art treasures.
Witnesses:
Oral evidence given on 18.4.46 (Day 111):
by Rudolf Bilfinger, Legal expert in R.S.H.A.
On:
Limitations of Governor General's position, especially by
S.S. and Police.
Oral evidence given on 18.4.46 (Day 111):
by Dr. Kurt von Burgsdorf, Governor of Cracow district.
On:
Limitations of Governor General's position, especially by
S.S. and Police;
Maidanek concentration camp;
Defendant's attitude to Poles and Ukrainians.
Oral evidence given on 23.4.46 (Day 112): By Dr. Joseph Buehler, State Secretary to Government General. On: Limitations of Governor General's position, especially by S.S. and Police; Jewish policy; Maidanek concentration camp; Defendant's attitude to Poles and Ukrainians; A.B.(Extraordinary Pacification) action; Warsaw uprising of 1944; Labour recruitment. Oral evidence given in Part 11: By Dr. Hans H. Lammers. On: Limitations of Governor General's position, especially by S.S. and Police; Jewish policy; Defendant's attitude to Poles and Ukrainians; A.B. (Extraordinary Pacification) action; Warsaw uprising of 1944. Examined by Counsel for other defendants
Submission of documents, mainly extracts from defendant's diary
The case for FRICK. Submission of documents. Oral evidence given on 24, 25, and 26.4.46 (Days 113, 114, 115) by Dr. Hans Bernd Gisevius, Civil servant, Anti-Nazi. On: Defendant's positions and their limitations as Reich Minister of the Interior: Separation of Police - Goering's and Himmler's role; Concentration camps; Roehm purge. Oral evidence given in Part 11 By Dr. Hans H. Lammers. On: Defendant's positions and their limitations as Reich Minister of the Interior: Separation of Police-Goering's and Himmler's role; Concentration camps; Killing of incurably insane persons. as General Plenipotentiary for Reich administration; as Reich Protector for Bohemia and Moravia. Examined by Counsel for other defendants. The case for Streicher. Oral evidence of defendant Streicher, given on 26. and 29.4.46 (Day 115, 116): On: Details of his career, First meeting with Hitler, Hitler Putsch, Anti-Jewish Boycott of 1.4.33, Nuremberg laws of 1935, Destruction of Nuremberg synagogue, Pogrom of November, 1938, Defendant's disfavour with the Party, His views on solution of Jewish question, Aryanisation of Jewish property. Oral evidence given on 29.4.46 (Day 116) By F. Herrwerth, Defendant's chauffeur: On: Defendant's disapproval of November '38 pogrom; Disfavour with the Party.
Oral evidence given on 29.4.46 (Day 116): By A. Streicher, Defendant's wife: On: Disfavour with the Party; His views on solution of Jewish question.
Oral evidence given on 30.4.46 (Day 117) By Dr. Strobel, Lawyer: On Defendant's disapproval of November '38 pogrom. Oral evidence given on 30.4.46 (Day 117) By E. Hiemer, Editor-in-Chief of "Der Sturmer": On: Decline of influence since 1933; His views on solution of Jewish question. Oral evidence given on 30.4.46 (Day 117) By P. Wurzbacher, SA Fuehrer in Nuremberg: On his views on solution of Jewish question. Examined by Counsel for other defendants. Submission of documents.
The case for SCHACHT. Oral evidence of defendant Schacht, given on 30.4.46 and 1.5.46 (Days 117 & 118): on Career up to 1930, First meeting with Hitler, Activities before Nazi seizure of power, Reasons for defendant's entry into Cabinet, Relations to leading Nazis, Appraisal of Party programme and "Mein Kampf", Attitude to Leadership Principle, to master race doctrine, to the Jewish question, to living space idea, Change of his opinion about Hitler; Versailles Treaty, His efforts for its peaceful modification, Hitler's warlike intentions, Austria's Anschluss, Incorporation of Sudetenland; Defendant's economic policy, Motives for and methods of financing rearmament, His struggle for release from his posts.
[
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.