David Irving's Hitler © Copyright H. David Kirk
During the Aschaffenburg Hitler Congress
--Gerald Fleming,
Does it matter whether it was in 1920 that Hitler became an
antisemite or in the days of his youth in Vienna? For those who
remember the travesties of Hitler's regime, and even more for those
murdered by it, the beginnings hardly matter. Today, what matters is
the evident continuation and expansion of the lies that became the
Nazi justification for mass murder. Fourteen years have passed since
Eberhard Jäckel's essays appeared in a German symposium on the TV
series Holocaust. It is disconcerting to realize that their focus
has become even more necessary for understanding the movement that
calls itself 'historical revisionism.' By exposing facets of
Irving's
'historical method,' his twisting of facts, his misrepresentations,
Jäckel undermines a central theme dear to the so-called
'revisionists,' namely that Hitler is not to blame for the physical
destruction of the Jewish people of Europe. From that assertion it
is only a short jump to the claim that the Holocaust is a fraud, and
another to the assertion that it is a fraud manufactured by Jews to
defraud Germany.
In preparing this translation, several of
Irving's books besides
Hitler's War, and commentaries on it, helped to shed light on
Irving's 'historical method.' It is now possible to amplify, and in
one instance to clarify, Professor Jäckel's dissection of
Irving's
Hitler-cleansing thesis.
As previously noted, the German historian, Martin Broszat, also
wrote<49> about
Irving's 'Führer-cleansing' thesis found in Hitler's
War. Here is one of many passages demonstrating the technique of
'Führer-cleanup':
Some two-thirds of the 800 pages deal with Hitler's direction of
the war, and with military events and problems.... His
Hitler-book shows clearly the suggestive power of attraction that
the struggles of the German armies under the command of Hitler has
for this author. What is being told here 'between the lines' is
the gripping story of the better leader and commander-in-chief,
and the better army, who, after enormous war exertions, finally
succumb to the power and the material surfeit of the less good
opponents.... What the author writes is a war novel. An example
is the following from his description of the Poland campaign:
'Hitler's positive enjoyment of the battle scenes was undeniable.
He visited the front whenever he could, heedless of the risk to
himself and his escort....'
A frequently varied theme to which
Irving gives strong verbal
emphasis is the [Führer's] bravery and steadiness in crises. Thus
he introduces the description of the threat of catastrophe during
the Russian war winter of 1941-42 with these sentences (p. 355):
'In the dark months of that winter Hitler showed his iron
determination and hypnotic powers of leadership. We shall see how
these qualities and the German soldier's legendary capacity for
enduring hardships spared the eastern army from cruel defeat that
winter.' ...
The 'strategy' of de-demonizing Hitler, running through the book,
is based on the fact that here ideological and political
considerations are being pushed into the background in favor of
the more important, and supposedly value-free, account of military
events. That is especially noticeable in the story of Hitler's
secret euthanasia-order ['mercy- killings' by gas of the mentally
ill] after the beginning of war, an order which is frequently
(falsely) linked to and justified by military necessity.
There follows this explanatory footnote:
Irving introduces the section dealing with that event (page 20)
with the following observation: 'The ostensible occasion for this
formal decision was related to war needs. About a quarter of a
million hospital beds were required for Germany's mental
institutions ... They occupied bed space and the attention of
skilled medical personnel which Hitler now urgently needed for the
treatment of the casualties in his coming campaigns.'
Broszat adds: 'In none of the relevant documents can that
explanation for the euthanasia-actions be found.' In other words,
Irving does not hesitate to interpret what he thinks is needed for,
or to omit what runs counter to, a cleansing of Hitler's demon image.
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
A Faulty History Dissected
Two Essays by Eberhard Jäckel
Translation & Comments by H. David Kirk
"Translator's Postscript: To Tell the Truth ...
held on 1 and 2 July 1978, the writer David Irving
asked Professor Eberhard Jäckel,
'When, in your view, did Hitler become an antisemite?
Hitler and the Final Solution <48>
Irving's Non Sequitur Reasonings and Omissions