David Irving's Hitler © Copyright 1993
When
David Irving's work first began to appear, it seemed no
more than a journalist's attempt to re-work a few major
themes of the Second World War and its background. Today we
understand his project as something larger and more
sinister: a kind of retrospective moral upgrading of the
Third Reich and its leader, with all that implies for
contemporary politics in Germany and elsewhere. We also know
that his writings have been flowing into the swelling river
of Holocaust denial, refreshing it with bits of near-fact
and pseudo-fact, all intended to move a few more readers
toward the acceptance of an absurdity: the relative
innocence of the Nazis, or at least, the moral equivalence
of the Nazis and their enemies in the Second World War.
This context makes Eberhard Jäckel's two essays on
Irving's
methods even more valuable and fascinating than they were
when Jäckel wrote them, some years before
Irving became
notorious. Jäckel demonstrates, with a scholar's precision,
the ingenious ways in which
Irving manipulates evidence,
collecting whatever fits his preconceptions, misinterpreting
as he chooses, and ignoring whatever fails to support his
views. Over the years
Irving has persuaded many readers in
the English-speaking countries that he provides an
understanding of the contents of certain German archives,
but it will be hard for anyone, after reading Jäckel, to
think of
Irving as anything but a propagandist.
At another time, in a different moral atmosphere,
Irving's
work would not deserve such detailed scrutiny; his nimble
deceptions would be of interest only to specialists. In the
present climate, however, he is a dangerous man to ignore.
He plays to a section of the public that wants to believe
him, a section largely created by the entrepreneurs of
Holocaust denial.
When Holocaust denial first made itself heard in public, its
claims seemed so absurd that historians and journalists
dismissed it as a temporary aberration, an eccentricity on
the lunatic fringes of opinion. It wasn't until the early
1980s that we ceased to shrug it off, began to see it for
the historical phenomenon that it is, and began trying to
understand both its roots in traditional antisemitism and
its peculiar appeal in the present age.
It can be best understood not only as a branch of standard
antisemitism but also as a specific product of its own time,
roughly the period 1970 to the present. Holocaust denial,
like the Holocaust itself, is without precedent: no one, not
even
Joseph Goebbels, has ever before produced so large and
imaginative a lie. Conspiracy theories have frequently
appeared during the last two hundred years, but all of them
have been, by comparison, modest.
The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion, in its many versions, asks us to believe
merely that a small group of men secretly agreed to take
coordinated action to destroy civilization, in order to
benefit themselves and their race. This much-reprinted
fiction seemed monstrous when it first went into wide
circulation, early in the 20th century, but it looks
insignificant when placed besides the Holocaust denial
thesis.
The deniers (I avoid calling them "revisionists," since I
think historical revision is honest and important work,
practised by all good historians) ask us to believe in a
conspiracy that involves hundreds of thousands of Iying
witnesses and at least an equal number of falsified
documents, all of them accepted by thousands of otherwise
sensible historians. Magically, no one connected with this
conspiracy has ever broken ranks and told the truth, or even
accidentally revealed the plot in a letter or overheard
phone conversation. The deniers therefore imply that "the
facts" can be learned only by inference, teased out of
obscure documents uncovered by
Irving and others.
This is obviously unbelievable, but what makes it
exceptional is the extent to which it is unbelievable. It
would be far easier to believe in, say, the witches of
Salem, whose activities were blamed on magical powers from
the underworld.
[Continued]
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
A Faulty History Dissected
Two Essays by Eberhard Jäckel
Translation & Comments by H. David Kirk
© Foreword, Robert Fulford
Foreword
by Robert Fulford