Seventy-Eighth Day:
Monday, 11th March, 1946
[Page 292]
A. Yes.
Q. You did not know about it?
A. These people were prisoners of war, Italians, who were at
our disposal for work according to an agreement with the
Italian Government, which we had recognized. Mussolini had
expressly put these men at our disposal for this purpose.
Q. Excuse me for interrupting you, but let us not bother
with Mussolini here. I ask you whether you still stand by
the statement you made, earlier, as I recall it, that you
did not know of any forced labour brought in from the
occupied countries to Germany. Is that your statement, or
isn't it?
A. Insofar as they were free workers and free people, I
still maintain this. My point is that these were people who
had been placed at our disposal, and, as far as we are
concerned, at the time this was said, there was still an
Italian Government though this fact is forgotten today; but
at that time it still existed.
Q. I call your attention to Page 1827 of the minutes of this
meeting at which you were present, and where the discussion
you just admitted took place, and I call your attention to
the line opposite the name "Sauckel," from which it appears
that Sauckel then reported:
Q. You have no recollection of that?
A. No, I have no recollection of that.
Q. Well, we will go on then to Conference No. 23 of the
Central Planning Board, held 3rd November, 1942. It is the
English translation, Page 27. The German text is on Page
1024, in which it appears that you were present at and
participated in the discussion, and I call your attention to
Page 1024, Line 10, to these entries of the stenographic
minutes:
Roland: We have installed our own office in Paris. I see,
you mean the French should give the names of the smelters
who are prisoners of war in Germany?
Milch: I would simply say, you get two men in exchange
for one.
Speer: The French firms know exactly which prisoner; of
war are smelters. Unofficially, you should create the
impression that they would be released. They give us the
names and then we get them out. Have a try.
Roland: That is an idea."
A. Yes; that is to say, two people from another trade for
one of these particular skilled workers.
Q. That was your entire objective?
A. The entire purpose was to get these people and to give
them others in exchange.
Q. Now, let us take up Conference 53 of the Planning Board,
held 16th February, 1944; English translation, Page 26, and
the German from 1851 on.
[Page 293]
A. Yes, I can remember that distinctly.
Q. And on Page 1873, you come forward with this suggestion:
Q. Among foreign workers, was it not?
A. No, these were Englishmen, the slackers.
Q. Englishmen are foreigners in Germany, are they not? I do
not know what you mean, they were not foreigners. They were
Englishmen.
A. Englishmen never worked for us. So they cannot have been
Englishmen.
Q. What were they? You say they were all German.
A. What we understood as slackers were those people who were
compelled to work during the war and normally were not
regular workers, but were forcibly made to work during the
war.
Q. We will get to that in a minute. First, I want to ask you
how Himmler was going to make them work. What did Himmler
do, what methods did Himmler use? Why were you making
proposals to Himmler in this matter?
A. Because Himmler at a meeting had stated that as regards
supplementary rations - the worker in Germany had She same
basic rations as the rest of the population - and, apart
from this, he received quite considerable additions which,
in the case of the heaviest workers, were several times the
normal basic rations. The general routine was that these
rations were issued by food officers irrespective of where
and how the individual was working. The suggestion was made
by Himmler that these additions should be made dependent
upon the output of the workers. This was possible in the
case of those workers who came from concentration camps,
etc., and were under Himmler. This procedure could not be
applied to free workers, hence the proposal to bring to
reason those who sabotaged work in their own country by
issuing additional rations as laid down for their type of
work only in proportion to their output.
Q. You know the difference between labour camps and
concentration camps, do you not?
A. Yes, of course.
Q. And these people who were doing work in these industries
were kept mainly in the work camps, were they not, in which
their rations were apportioned without Himmler's control?
[Page 294]
Q. You still say that all you are talking about were German
and never foreign workers. Now, be clear about that?
A. By "slackers" I meant German workers; in my opinion, only
these were in question.
Q. I call your attention to Page 1913:-
A. Yes.
Q. And then you proceed to complain that:-
A. That may well be the case.
Q. What did you suggest?
A. I can remember cases where foreign workers threatened and
even assaulted their German foreman and when he defended
himself, action was taken against him. I did not think it
right.
Q. Now, you provided your own remedy, did you not? In the
next line you say:-
A. I cannot remember the exact words but I stick to the
point that it was an impossible situation for a prisoner or
foreign worker to be able to say to his German foreman "We
will cut your throat," and the foreman . . .
Q. Well, do you mean to say that if a prisoner of war
attempted or threatened to cut his employer's throat, that
German officers would stand up for him as against the
employer? You do not mean that, do you?
A. (No answer.)
Q. Well, we will go on:-
A. Yes, I see it here.
Q. ". . . and runs the risk of having his prisoners of war
taken from him."
[Page 295]
A. I have found it, and I can only say I have never had
anybody hanged nor have I even given such an order, I could
not possibly have said such a thing. I had nothing to do
with this question. Neither do I know of any instance where
two Russian officers tried to escape by plane.
Q. Is there anything else you would like to say with
reference to that entry?
A. No, I have nothing to say. I do not know anything about
it and I also do not believe I ever said it.
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: That is all that I have to ask at the
present time.
MR. ROBERTS:
Q. Witness, I have some questions on behalf of the British
Delegation. My first point is this: You said on Friday that
beginning in 1935, an Air Force was built up in Germany for
defensive purposes. Do you remember that?
A. Yes, 1935.
Q. And do you say that it remained on a defensive basis up
to December 1939?
A. Yes.
Q. You do. I want you to listen to three pieces of evidence
- speeches made by your chief, the defendant Goering. I am
quoting from the shorthand notes of 8th January, in the
afternoon, at Page 67, Part 4. In May 1935, Goering said:-
A. No, that does not sound like it, but one has to
distinguish between words and deeds.
Q. I will come to the deeds in a moment.
(Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: If there is any more of this laughter, the
court will have to be cleared.
MR. ROBERTS:
Q. On the 8th of July, 1938, Goering, addressing a number of
German aircraft manufacturers, said:-
A. No, that certainly does not sound like it. I should like
to be allowed to say something about that, when you have
finished.
Q. Please limit yourself, if you can, in the interest of
time, to answering my question, which is very short. Now may
I read you one further piece of evidence, the speech made by
Goering on 14th October, 1938, that is, less than a month
after the Munich Pact:-
A. This Air Force would have taken many years to build.
[Page 296]
A. What was the date please?
Q. I would like you to see the Document, which is 79-L. You
did see it on Friday, I think.
A. On 23rd May, was it not?
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
(Part 9 of 12)
[MR. JUSTICE JACKSON continues his cross examination of General Field-Marshal Milch] "Out of the five million foreign workers who arrived in
Germany not even two hundred thousand came voluntarily."
A. No, I cannot remember that at all.
"Speer: Well, under the pretext of industry we could
deceive the French into believing that we would release
all prisoners of war who are rollers and smelters if they
give us their names.
Now, your purpose was to get two men in place of one; is
that right?
"The armament industry employs foreign workers in large
numbers; according to the latest figures, 40 per cent.
The latest allocations from the Plenipotentiary General
for Man-power are mostly foreigners and we had to give up
many German workers in the combing-out drive. In
particular the aircraft industry, which is a young
industry, employs a great many young men who should be
called up. This will, however, be very difficult, as
those working for experimental stations cannot be
touched. In mass production, the foreign workers
preponderate and in some instances represent 95 per cent.
and even more. Eighty-eight per cent. of the workers
engaged on the production of our best new engine are
Russian prisoners of war, and the 12 percent. are German
men and women. On the Ju-52's, which are now regarded as
transport planes only, and the monthly production of
which is from fifty to sixty machines, only six to eight
German workers are engaged; the rest are Ukrainian women
who have lowered the record of production of skilled
workers."
Do you recall that?
"Milch: The list of slackers should be handed to Himmler.
He will make them work all right. This is of great
general educational importance, and has also a deterrent
effect on others who would also like to shirk."
A. Yes, this applies again to the slackers in agriculture,
as I mentioned this morning.
"Milch:-"
This is your contribution at that point -
"It is therefore quite impossible to utilize every
foreigner to the full, unless we make them do piecework
and are in a position to take measures against foreigners
who are not doing their bit."
Do you find that entry?
"If a foreman lays his hands on a prisoner of war and
boxes his ears, there is at once a terrible row; the man
is put in prison. There are many officials in Germany who
consider it their first duty to stand up for other men's
human rights instead of looking after war production. I
too am for human rights, but if a Frenchman says 'You
fellows will be hanged and the works manager will be the
first to have his head cut off,' and then if the boss
says 'I'll give him one for that,' then he is in for it.
Nobody sides with the manager, but only with the "poor
devil" who said that to him."
Did you report that to the meeting?
"I told my engineers 'if you do not hit a man like this,
then I shall punish you. The more you do in this respect,
the more I shall think of you; I shall see to it that
nothing happens to you.' This has not yet gone round. I
cannot talk to every works manager individually. But I
should like to see someone try to stop me, as I can deal
with anyone who tries it."
Do you find that?
"If the small works' manager - "
I am still quoting from you -
"does that, he is put into a concentration camp . . ."
Do you find that?
"In one case, two Russian officers took off with an
aeroplane but crashed. I ordered that these two men be
hanged at once. They were hanged or shot yesterday. I
left that to the SS. I wanted them to be hanged in the
factory for the others to see."
Do you find that?
"I intend to create a Luftwaffe which, if the hour should
strike, will burst upon the foe like an avenging host.
The enemy must feel that he has lost even before he has
started fighting."
Does that sound like a defensive air force?
"War with Czechoslovakia is imminent; the German Air
Force is already superior to the English Air Force. If
Germany wins the war, she will be the greatest power in
the world, she will dominate the world markets, and
Germany will be a rich nation. To attain this goal risks
must be taken."
Does that sound like a defensive German Air Force? Does it?
"Hitler has ordered me to organize a gigantic armament
programme, which would make all previous achievements
appear insignificant. I have been ordered to build as
rapidly as possible an Air Force five times as large as
the present one."
Does that sound like an air force for defensive purposes?