Third Day:
Thursday, 22st November, 1945
I would like to call your attention first of all to an
Organisation with which we will have to become very
familiar: the Leadership Corps of the NSDAP, the
"Reichsleiter," which has been named as a defendant
Organisation and which comprises the sum of the officials
and leaders of the Nazi Party. If your Honour will be good
enough to follow me down the centre line of the chart, we
come to the main horizontal line of division where the word
"Reichsleiter" appears. That is the first category of the
Leadership Corps, I should say, the main category, perhaps,
of the Leadership Corps.
The Fuehrer, of course, stands above it. As we follow the
vertical line of division to the lower part of the chart, we
reach five additional boxes, which may be referred to
collectively as the "Hoheitstraeger," the bearers of the
sovereignty of the Party, and those are the "Gauleiter," the
"Kreisleiter," the "Ortsgruppenleiter," the "Zellenleiter,"
and the "Blockleiter."
The Fuehrer at the top of our chart is the supreme and the
only leader in the Nazi hierarchy. His successor-designate
was first, the defendant Hess, and subsequently the
defendant Goering.
The "Reichsleiter," of whom sixteen are shown on this chart,
comprise collectively the Party Directorate (Reichsleitung).
Through them, co-ordination of the Party and State machinery
was achieved. A number of these "Reichsleiter,"
[Page 92]
Among the former Reichsleiter, on trial in this cause, may
be included the following defendants:-
If your Honour will follow me to this broad, horizontal
line, we started at the extreme left at the box marked with
the defendant Frank's name. At one time, although not in
March, 1945, he was the Head of the Legal Office of the
Party. He was the "Reichsleiter des Reichsrechtsamtes."
In the third square appears the defendant Rosenberg, the
delegate of the Fuehrer for Ideological Training and
Education of the Party. He was called "Der Beauftragte des
Fuehrers fur die Uberwachung der gesammten geistigen und
weltanschaulichen Schulung und Erziehung der NSDAP." Next to
him, to the right, is the defendant von Schirach, Leader of
Youth Education (Leiter fur die Jugenderziehung). Next to
him, appears the late defendant Robert Ley, at one time Head
of the Party Organisation (Reichsorganisationsleiter der
NSDAP) and also the Leader of the German Labour Front
(Leiter der Deutschen Arbeitsfront).
Then, if we cross the vertical line, and proceed to the
right, in passing I might allude to the box marked with the
name of Schwarz. He was the Party Official and Reichsleiter,
who certified to the chart before the Tribunal.
As we proceed further to the right, next to the last box, we
find the name of Frick, who was the leader of the Reichstag
fraction (Leiter des NS Reichstags-fraktion).
The next categories to be considered are the
"Hoheitstraeger," at the bottom of the vertical line, in the
centre of the chart. The National Socialists called them the
bearers of sovereignty. To them was assigned the political
sovereignty over specially designated subdivisions of the
State, of which they were the appointed leaders. The
"Hoheitstraeger " may be said to represent the vertical
Organisation of the Party.
These leaders, these "Hoheitstraeger" included all
Gauleiters, of whom there were 42 within the Reich in 1945.
A "Gauleiter" was a political leader of the largest
subdivision of the State. He was charged by the Fuehrer with
the political, cultural and economic control over all forms
and manifestations of the life of the people and the co-
ordination of the same with National Socialist philosophy
and ideology.
A number of the defendants, before the bar of this Tribunal,
were former "Gauleiter" of the NSDAP. I mention, in this
connection, the defendant
[Page 93]
The next lower category on the chart, were the
"Kreisleiter," the political leaders of the largest
subdivision within a Gau. Then follow the "Ortsgruppen-
leiter," the political leaders of the largest subdivision
within the Kreis. And a Kreis consisted perhaps of several
towns or villages or, in the case of a larger city, anywhere
from 1,500 to 3,000 households.
The next "Hoheitstraeger" were the Zellenleiter, the
political leaders of a group from four to eight city blocks,
or of a corresponding group within country districts, and
then follow the Blockleiter, the political leaders of from
40 to 60 households.
Now, each of these political leaders, of these
"Hoheitstraeger," or bearers of sovereignty, was directly
responsible to the next highest leader in the Nazi
hierarchy. The Gauleiter was directly responsible to the
Fuehrer himself; the Kreisleiter was directly
responsible to the Gauleiter; the Ortsgruppenleiter to the
Kreisleiter, and so on.
The Fuehrer himself, reserved to himself, in accordance with
the philosophy that runs through the Party, the right to
name all fuehrers. It was he, personally, that named the
Reichsleiter, all members of the Party Directorate. It was
he that appointed all Gauleiter and Kreisleiter and all
political leaders, down to the grade of "Gauamtsleiter,"
which was a lower classification of political leader within
the Party Organisation of the Gau.
These "Hoheitstraeger," together with the Reichsleitung,
constituted the all-powerful group of leaders by means of
which the Nazi Party reached right down into the lives of
the people, consolidated its control of them and compelled
them to conform to the National Socialist pattern. For this
purpose broad powers were given to them, including the right
to call upon all Party formations to effectuate their plans.
They could requisition the services of the SA and of the SS,
as well as of the HJ and of the NSKK. If I may direct your
attention, for the moment, to the Party organisations that
appear at the extreme left of the chart, I would just like
to say that structurally these were organised regionally to
with the offices and regions controlled by the
"Hoheitstraeger." If I might be more explicit, let us take
the SA. The subsidiary formations of the SA came down and
corresponded, in its lower organisations, to the Gau, so
that we have "Gauleitung" in the SA, and further down, to
the Kreis, so that we have a Kreisleitung within the Kreis.
Thus, we have a Kreisleitung in the SA so that the Gauleiter
and the Kreisleiter, to cite two examples, charged with a
particular duty by the Fuehrer, could call on these
organisations for assistance in carrying out their tasks.
These sinister implications of the use of this power will
become more apparent as the prosecution's case develops, and
as the wealth of evidentiary material is introduced into
evidence to prove the criminality of the defendant
organisations.
The component Party-organisations, called "Gliederungen"
within the Party, are shown at the extreme left of the
chart, and are the organisations to which I directed the
attention of your Honour a moment ago. These organisations
actually constitute the Party itself, and substantially the
entire Party-membership is contained within them. The four
principal organisations are sometimes referred to as
"paramilitary" organisations. They were uniformed
organisations and they were armed. These were the notorious
SA and SS, who are named as party-defendants in this case,
the HJ (Hitler Youth) and the NSKK (the Motor Corps of the
Party'). Then there were also the National Socialist Women's
Organisation, the National Socialist German Students Bund
(Deutscher Studentenbund), and the National Socialist
University Teachers' Bund.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
(Part 3 of 8)
[MR. ALBRECHT continues]