Judgment:
[Page 66]
Article 9 of the Charter provides:
"After receipt of the Indictment the Tribunal
shall give such notice as it thinks fit that the
prosecution intends to ask the Tribunal to make
such declaration and any member of the
organisation will be entitled to apply to the
Tribunal for leave to be heard by the Tribunal
upon the question of the criminal character of the
organisation. The Tribunal shall have power to
allow or reject the application. If the
application is allowed, the Tribunal may direct in
what manner the applicants shall be represented
and heard."
Article 10 of the Charter makes clear that the declaration
of criminality against an accused organisation is final, and
cannot be challenged in any subsequent criminal proceeding
against a member of the organisation. Article 10 is as
follows:
The effect of the declaration of criminality by the Tribunal
is well illustrated by Law Number 10 of the Control Council
of Germany passed on 20th day of December, 1945, which
provides:
...
"(d) Membership in categories of a criminal group
or organisation declared criminal by the
International Military Tribunal.
...
(3) Any person found guilty of any of the crimes
above mentioned may upon conviction be punished as
shall be determined by the Tribunal to be just.
Such punishment may consist of one or more of the
following:
(a) Death.
(b) Imprisonment for life or a term of years, with
or without hard labor.
(c) Fine, and imprisonment with or without hard labour, in lieu
thereof."
In effect, therefore, a member of an organisation which the
Tribunal has declared to be criminal may be subsequently
convicted of the crime of membership and be punished for
that crime by death. This is not to assume that
international or military courts which will try these
individuals will not exercise appropriate standards of
justice. This is a far reaching and novel procedure. Its
application, unless properly safeguarded, may produce great
injustice.
Article 9, it should be noted, uses the words "The Tribunal
may declare" so that the Tribunal is vested with discretion
as to whether it will declare any organisation criminal.
This discretion is a judicial one and does not permit
arbitrary action, but should be exercised in accordance with
well-settled legal
[Page 67]
principles, one of the most important of which is that
criminal guilt is personal, and that mass punishments should
be avoided. If satisfied of the criminal guilt of any
organisation or group, this Tribunal should not hesitate to
declare it to be criminal because the theory of "group
criminality" is new, or because it might be unjustly applied
by some subsequent tribunals. On the other hand, the
Tribunal should make such declaration of criminality so far
as possible in a manner to insure that innocent persons will
not be punished.
A criminal organisation is analogous to a criminal
conspiracy in that the essence of both is cooperation for
criminal purposes. There must be a group bound together and
organized for a common purpose. The group must be formed or
used in connection with the commission of crimes denounced
by the Charter. Since the declaration with respect to the
organisations and groups will, as has been pointed out, fix
the criminality of its members, that definition should
exclude persons who had no knowledge of the criminal
purposes or acts of the organisation and those who were
drafted by the State for membership, unless they were
personally implicated in the commission of acts declared
criminal by Article 6 of the Charter as members of the
organisation. Membership alone is not enough to come within
the scope of these declarations.
Since declarations of criminality which the Tribunal makes
will be used by other courts in the trial of persons on
account of their membership in the organisations found to be
criminal, the Tribunal feels it appropriate to make the
following recommendations:
1. That so far as possible throughout the four zones of
occupation in Germany the classifications, sanctions, and
penalties be standardized. Uniformity of treatment so far as
practical should be a basic principle. This does not, of
course, mean that discretion in sentencing should not be
vested in the court; but the discretion should be within
fixed limits appropriate to the nature of the crime.
2. Law No. 10, to which reference has already been made,
leaves punishment entirely in the discretion of the trial
court even to the extent of inflicting the death penalty.
The De-Nazification Law of 5th March, 1946, however, passed
for Bavaria, Greater-Hesse, and Wuerttemberg-Baden, provides
definite sentences for punishment in each type of offense.
The Tribunal recommends that in no case should punishment
imposed under Law No. 10 upon any members of an organisation
or group declared by the Tribunal to be criminal exceed the
punishment fixed by the De-Nazification Law. No person
should be punished under both laws.
3. The Tribunal recommends to the Control Council that Law
No. 10 be amended to prescribe limitations on the punishment
which may be imposed for membership in a criminal group or
organisation so that such punishment shall not exceed the
punishment prescribed by the De-Nazification Law.
The Indictment asks that the Tribunal declare to be criminal
the following organisations: The Leadership Corps of the
Nazi Party; the Gestapo; the S.D.; the S.S.; the S.A.; the
Reich Cabinet, and the General Staff and High Command of the
German Armed Forces.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
The Accused Organisations: General
(Part 1 of 10)
"At the trial of any individual member of any
group or organisation the Tribunal may declare (in
connection with any act of which the individual
may be convicted) that the group or organisation
of which the individual was a member was a
criminal organisation."
"In cases where a group or organisation is
declared criminal by the Tribunal, the competent
national authority of any Signatory shall have the
right to bring individuals to trial for membership
therein before national, military or occupation
courts. In any such case the criminal nature of
the group or organisation is considered proved and
shall not be questioned."
"Each of the following acts is recognized as a
crime:
The
original plaintext version of this file is available via
ftp.