Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression
D. Definition of Issues for Trial.
The progress of this trial will be expedited by clear
definition of the issues to be tried. I have indicated what
we consider to be the proper criteria of guilt. There are
also subjects which we think are not relevant before this
Tribunal, some of which are mentioned in the specific
questions asked by the Tribunal.
Only a single ultimate issue is before this Tribunal for
decision. That is whether accused organizations properly may
be characterized as criminal ones or as innocent ones.
Nothing is relevant here that does not bear on a question
that would be common to the case of every member. Any matter
which would be exculpating for some members but not for all
is irrelevant here.
We think it is not relevant to this proceeding at this stage
that one or many members were conscripted if in general the
membership was voluntary. It may be conceded that
conscription is a good defense for an individual charged
with membership in a criminal organization, but an
organization can have criminal purposes and commit criminal
acts even if a portion of its membership consists of persons
who were compelled to Join it. The issue of conscription is
not pertinent to this proceeding but it is pertinent to the
trials of individuals for membership in organizations
declared criminal by this Tribunal.
We also think it is not relevant to this proceeding that one
or more members of the named organizations were ignorant of
its criminal purposes or methods if its purposes or methods
were open and notorious. An organization may have criminal
purposes and commit criminal acts although one or many of
its members were without personal knowledge thereof. If a
person joined what he thought was a social club but what in
fact was a gang of cutthroats and murderers, his lack of
knowledge would not exonerate the gang considered as a
group, although it might possibly be a factor in extenuation
of a charge of criminality brought against him for mere
membership in the organization. Even then the test would be
not what the man knew, but what, as a person of common
understanding, he should have known.
It is not relevant to this proceeding that one or more
members of the named organizations were themselves innocent
of unlawful acts. This proposition is basic to the entire
theory of the declaration of organizational criminality. The
purpose of declaring criminality of organizations, as in
every conspiracy charge,
[Page 17]
is punishment for aiding crimes, although the precise
perpetrators may never be found or identified. We know that
the Gestapo and SS, as organizations, were given principal
responsibility for the extermination of the Jewish people in
Europe but beyond a few isolated instances, we can never
establish which members of the Gestapo or SS actually
carried out the murders Any member guilty of direct
participation in such crimes can be tried on the charge of
having committed specific crimes in addition to the general
charge of membership in a criminal organization. Therefore,
it is wholly immaterial that one or more members of the
organizations were themselves allegedly innocent of specific
wrongdoing. The purpose of this proceeding is not to reach
instances of individual criminal conduct, even in subsequent
trials and, therefore, such considerations are irrelevant
here.
Another question raised by the Tribunal is the period of
time during which the groups or organizations named in the
Indictment are claimed by the Prosecution to have been
criminal. The Prosecution believes that each organization
should be declared criminal during the period referred to in
the Indictment. We do not contend that the Tribunal is
without power to condition its declaration so as to cover a
lesser period of time than that set forth in the Indictment.
The Prosecution feels, however, that there is in the record
at this time adequate evidence to support the charge of
criminality with respect to each of the named organizations
during the full period of time set forth in the Indictment.
Another question raised by the Tribunal is whether any
classes of persons included within the accused groups or
organizations should be excluded from the declaration of
criminality. It is, of course necessary that the Tribunal
relate its declaration to some identifiable group or
organization. The Tribunal, however, is not expected or
required to be bound by formalities of organization In
framing the Charter, the use was deliberately avoided of
terms or concepts which would involve this trial in legal
technicalities about juristic persons" or "entities."
Systems of jurisprudence e not uniform in the refinements of
these fictions. The concept of the Charter, therefore, is a
nontechnical one. "Group" or "organization should be given
no artificial or sophistical meaning. or group was used in
the Charter as a broader term, implying a looser and less
formal structure or relationship than is in he
organization." The terms mean in the context of e Charter
what they mean in the ordinary speech of people. The
[Page 18]
test to identify a group or organization is, we submit, a
natural and common-sense one.
It is important to bear in mind that while the Tribunal no
doubt has power to make its own definition of the groups it
will declare criminal, the precise composition and
membership of groups and organizations is not an issue for
trial here. There is no Charter requirement and no practical
need for the Tribunal to define a group or organization with
such particularity that its precise composition or
membership is thereby determined. The creation of a
mechanism for later trial of such issues was a recognition
that the declaration of this Tribunal is not decisive of
such questions and is likely to be so general as to
comprehend persons who on more detailed inquiry will prove
to be outside of it. An effort by this Tribunal to try
questions of exculpation of individuals, few or many, would
unduly protract the trial, transgress the limitation of the
Charter, and quite likely do some mischief by attempting to
adjudicate precise boundaries on evidence which is not
directed to that purpose.
The prosecution stands upon the language of the Indictment
and contends that each group or organization should be
declared criminal as an entity and that ho inquiry should be
entered upon and no evidence entertained as to the
exculpation of any class or classes of persons within such
descriptions. Practical reasons of conserving the Tribunal'
time combine with practical considerations for the
defendants. A single trial held in one city to deal with
questions of excluding thousands of defendants living all
over Germany could not be expected to do justice to each
member unless it was expected to endure indefinitely.
Provision for later, local trial of individual relationships
protects the rights of members better than can possibly be
done in proceedings before this Tribunal.
With respect to the Gestapo, the United States consents to
exclude persons employed in purely clerical, stenographic,
janitorial or similar unofficial routine tasks. As to the
Nazi Leadership Corps we abide by the position taken at the
time of submission of the evidence, that the following
should be included: the Fuehrer, the Reichsleitung (i.e.,
the Reichsleiters, main departments and officeholders), the
Gauleiters and their staff officers, the Kreisleiters and
their staff officers, the Ortsgruppenleiters, the
Zellenleiters, and the Blockleiters, but not members of the
staff of the last three officials. As regards the SA, it is
considered advisable that the Declaration expressly exclude
(1) wearers of the SA Sports Badge; (2) SA controlled Home
Guard Units
[Page 19]
(SA Wehrmannschaften) which were not strictly part of the
SA; (3) The Marchabteilungen of the N.S.K.O.V. (National
Socialist League for Disabled Veterans); and (4) the SA
Reserve, so as to include only the active part of the
organization, and that members who were never in any part of
that organization other than the Reserve should be excluded.
The Prosecution does not feel that there is evidence of the
severability of any class or classes of persons within the
organizations accused which would justify any further
concessions and feels that no other part of the named groups
should be excluded. In this connection, we would again
stress the principles of conspiracy. The fact that a section
of an organization itself admitted no criminal act, or may
have been occupied in technical or administrative functions,
does not relieve that section of criminal responsibility if
its activities contributed to the accomplishment of the
criminal enterprise.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Volume
II Chapter XV
Criminality of Groups and Organizations
The Law
Under Which the Nazi Organizations
Are Accused of Being Criminal
(Part 5 of 7)