Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression That declaration and agreement was to remain in force for at
least ten years and thereafter would remain valid unless it
was denounced by either Government six months before the
expiration of the ten years, or subsequently a denunciation,
with six months notice took place.
Both at the time of its signature and during the following
four years Hitler spoke of the German-Polish Agreement
publicly as though it were a corner-stone of his foreign
policy. By entering into it he persuaded many people that
his intentions were genuinely pacific, for the re-emergence
of an independent Poland had cost Germany much territory and
had separated East Prussia from the Reich. That Hitler
should of his own accord enter into friendly relations with
Poland; that in his speeches on foreign policy he should
proclaim his recognition of Poland's right to an exit to the
sea, and the necessity for Germans and Poles to live side by
side in amity -- these facts seemed to the world convincing
proof that Hitler had no "revisionist" aims which would
threaten the peace of Europe, and that he was even genuinely
anxious to put an end to the age-old hostility between the
Teuton and the Slav. If his professions were genuine his
policy excluded a renewal of the Drang nach Osten and
thereby would contribute to the stability of Europe. We
shall have occasion enough to see how little truth these
pacific professions contained. The history of the fateful
years from 1934 to 1939 shows quite clearly that the Germans
used this Treaty, as they used other treaties, merely as an
instrument of policy for furthering their aggressive aims.
It is clear from the documents now presented to the Tribunal
that these five years fall into two distinct phases in the
realization of aggressive aims which always underlay the
Nazi policy. There was first the period from the Nazi
assumption of power in 1933 until the autumn of 1937. That
was the preparatory period. During that time there occurred
the breaches of the Versailles and Locarno Treaties, the
feverish rearmament of Germany, the reintroduction of
conscription, the reoccupation and remilitarization of the
Rhineland, and all the other necessary preparatory measures
for future aggression with which my United States colleagues
have already so admirably dealt. During
[Page 613]
that time they lulled Poland into a false sense of security.
Not only Hitler, but also the Defendant Goering and the
Defendant Ribbentrop made statements approbating the Pact.
In 1935 Goering was saying that "the pact was not planned
for a period ten years but forever: there need not be the
slightest fear that it would not be continued." Even though
Germany was steadily building up the greatest war machine
that Europe had ever known, and although, by January 1937,
the German military position was so secure that Hitler could
refer openly to his strong Army, he took pains also to say
at the time that "by a series of agreements we have
eliminated existing tensions and thereby contributed
considerably to an improvement in the European atmosphere. I
merely recall the agreement with Poland which has worked out
to the advantage of both sides. ***" (2868-PS). And so it
went on -- abroad protestations of pacific intentions -- at
home "guns before butter"
In 1937, however, this preparatory period drew to a close
and Nazi policy moved from general preparation for future
aggression to specific planning for the attainment of
certain specific aggressive aims. Two documents in
particular mark this change. The first of these was an
important "Directive for unified preparation for War" issued
on 29 June 1937, by the Reich-Minister for War (von
Blomberg) and C-in-C of the Armed Forces (C-175). This
document is important, not only for its military directions,
but for the appreciation it contained of the European
situation and for the revelation it provides of the Nazi
attitude towards it.
"The general political position", von Blomberg stated,
"justifies the supposition that Germany need not
consider an attack from any side. Grounds for this are,
in addition to the lack of desire for war in almost all
Nations, particularly the Western Powers, the
deficiencies in the preparedness for war of a number of
States, and of Russia in particular". (C-175)
He added, it is true, "The intention of unleashing an
European War is held just as little by Germany". And it may
be that that phrase was carefully chosen, for Germany hoped
to conquer the world in detail: to fight on one front at a
time, not to unleash a general European conflict. But, he
went on, "the politically fluid world situation, which does
not preclude surprising incidents, demands a continuous
preparedness for war of the German Armed forces (a) to
counter attack at any time (yet he had just said at there
was no fear of any attack) and (b) to enable the military
exploitation of politically favorable opportunities should
they occur". That phrase is no more than a euphemistic
description
[Page 614]
of aggressive war. It reveals the continued adherence of the
German military leaders to the doctrine that military might,
and if necessary war, should be an instrument of policy --
the doctrine explicitly condemned by the Kellogg Pact, to
which Germany had adhered. The document goes on to set out
the general preparations necessary for a possible war in the
mobilization period 1937/1938. The document is evidence at
least for this -- that the leaders of the German Armed
Forces had it in mind to use the military strength which
they were building up for aggressive purposes. "No reason" -
- they say -- "to anticipate attack from any side *** there
is a lack of desire for war". Yet they prepare to "exploit
militarily favorable opportunities".
Still more important as evidence of the transition to
planned aggression is the record of the important conference
which Hitler held at the Reichs Chancellery on November
1937, at which von Blomberg, Reich Minister for War, von
Fritsch, C-in-C of the Army, Goering, C-in-C of the
Luftwaffe, Raeder, C-in-C of the Navy and von Neurath, then
the Reich Minister for Foreign Affairs, were present. The
minutes of that conference have already been put in evidence
(386-PS). I refer to them now to emphasize those passages
which make apparent the ultimate intention to wage an
aggressive war. As will be remembered, the burden of
Hitler's argument at that conference was that Germany
required more territory in Europe. Austria and
Czechoslovakia were specifically envisaged. But Hitler
realized that the process of conquering these two countries
might well bring into operation the treaty obligations of
Great Britain and France. He was prepared to take the risk.
"The history of all times: Roman Empire, British
Empire, has proved that every space expansion can only
be effected by breaking resistance and taking risks.
Even setbacks are unavoidable: neither formerly nor
today has space been found without an owner. The
attacker always comes up against the proprietor. The
question for Germany is where the great possible
conquest can be made at the lowest possible cost". (386-PS)
In the course of his address to that Conference Hitler had
foreseen and discussed the likelihood that Poland would be
involved if the aggressive expansionist aims which he put
forward brought about a general European war in the course
of their realization by Germany. When, therefore, on that
very day Hitler assured the Polish Ambassador of the value
of the 1934 Pact it can only be concluded that its real
value in Hitler's eyes was that of keeping Poland quiet
until Germany had acquired such a territorial and
[Page 615]
strategic position that Poland would no longer be a danger
to her. That view is confirmed by the events which followed.
At the beginning of February 1938 the change from Nazi
preparation for aggression to active aggression itself took
place. It was marked by the substitution of Ribbentrop for
Neurath as Foreign Minister, and of Keitel for Blomberg as
head of OKW. Its first fruits were the bullying of
Schuschnigg at Berchtesgaden on 12 February 1938, and the
forcible absorption of Austria in March. Thereafter the
Green Plan (Fall Gruen) for the destruction of
Czechoslovakia was steadily developed -- the plan partially
foiled, or of which the final consummation was at least
delayed, by the Munich Agreement.
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Volume
I Chapter IX
Opening Address for the United Kingdom
(Part 7 of 17)