Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression Along similar lines the navy was also carrying on the
concealed preparation of auxiliary cruisers, under the
disguised designation of Transport Ships O. The preparations
under this order were to be completed by 1 April 1935. At
the very time of construction of these ships as commercial
ships, plans- were made for their conversion. This was the
result of a Top Secret order from the command office of the
navy, dated 12 March 1934, and signed in draft by Groos.
This order bears the seal of the Reichsministerium,
Marineleitung, over the draft signature. It provides:
"Subject: Preparation of Auxiliary Cruisers.
"It is intended to include in the Establishment
Organization 35 (AG-Aufstellungsgliederung) a certain
number of auxiliary cruisers which are intended for use
in operations on the high seas.
[Page 435]
"In order to disguise the intention and all the
preparations the ships will be referred to as
"Transport Ships O". It is requested that in future
this designation only will be used.
"The preparations are to be arranged so that they can
be completed by 1.4.35." (C-166)
In the official navy files, notes were kept year by year,
from 127 to 1940, on the reconstruction of the German Navy.
One of these notes discloses that the displacement of the
battleship "Scharnhorst-Gneisenau" was actually greater than
the tonnage which had been notified to the British under the
treaty obligations:
"The true displacement of the battleship 'Scharnhorst-
Gneisenau' and 'F/G' exceeds by 20 percent in both
cases the displacement reported to the British." (C-2)
There is annexed to this document a table with reference to
different ships, and two columns, headed "Displacement by
Type"; one column reads "Actual Displacement," and the
other, "Notified Displacement." The actual displacement of
the "Scharnhorst" is thus shown to be 31,300 tons, although
the notified displacement was only 26,000 tons. On the "F/G"
actual was 41,700, while notified was 35,000. On the "HI",
actual was 56,200 tons, while notified was 46,850. And so on
down the list. (C-23)
In these notes there also occurs the statement,
"In a clear cut program for the construction, the
Fuehrer and Reich Chancellor has set the navy the task
of carrying out the aims of his foreign policy." (C-23)
The German Navy constantly planned and committed violations
of armament limitation, and with characteristic German
thoroughness had prepared superficial pretexts to explain
away these violations. Following a conference with the chief
of "A" section {the military department of the Navy], an
elaborate survey list was prepared and compiled, giving a
careful list of the quantity and type of German naval
armament and ammunition on hand under manufacture or
construction (C-32). A statement of the justification or
defense that might be used was included in those instances
where the Versailles Treaty was violated or its allotment
has been exceeded. The list contained 30 items under
"Material Measures" and 14 items under "Measures of
Organization." The variety of details covered necessarily
involved several sources thin the navy, which must have
realized their significance.
This Top Secret document, which is headed "A Survey Report
of German Naval Armament after Conference with Chief of "A"
Section, dated 9 September 1933," contains three columns,
one beaded "Measpre," one headed "Material Measures,
Details," and the third headed "Remarks." The "Remarks"
contain the pre-
[Page 436]
text or justification for explaining away the violations of
the treaty. The following are examples:
"1. Exceeding the permitted number of mines." Then
figures are given. "Remarks: Further mines are in part
ordered, in part being delivered." (C-32)
"Number 2. Continuous storing of guns from the North
Sea area for Baltic artillery batteries." The remarks
column reads, "Justification: Necessity for over-
hauling. Cheaper repairs." (C-32)
"Number 6. Laying gun-platforms in the Kiel area."
Remarks: "The offense over and above that in serial
number 3 lies in the fact that all fortifications are
forbidden in the Kiel area. This justification will
make it less severe; pure defense measures." (C-32)
"Number 7. Exceeding the calibre permitted for coastal
batteries." Remarks: "Possible justification is that,
though the calibre is larger, the number of guns is
less." (C-32)
"Number 8. Arming of mine-sweepers." Remarks: "The guns
are taken from the fleet reserve stores, have been
temporarily installed only for training purposes. All
nations arm their mine-sweeping forces (equality of
rights)." (C-32)
"Number 13. Exceeding the number of machine guns, et
cetera, permitted." Remarks: "Can be made light of." (C-
32)
"Number 18. Construction of U-boat parts." Remarks:
"Difficult to detect. If necessary can be denied." (C-
32)
"Number 20. Arming of fishing vessels." Remarks: "For
warning shots. Make little of it." And so on throughout
the list (C-32). This document must have been used as a
guide for negotiators who were attending the
Disarmament Conference, as to the position that they
might take.
13. Withdrawal From the Disarmament Conference and the
League of Nations: Building of the Air Force.
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Volume
I Chapter IX
Preparation for Aggression
1933-1936
(Part 9 of 14)