Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression [Page 428]
"(a) The inter-allied Control Commissions
"(b) Defense measures against the fulfillment of the
Versailles Treaty and independent arming behind the
back of the Reich Government and the legislative
bodies.
"1. Dispersal of artillery gear and munitions, of hand
and automatic weapons.
"2. Limitation of demolition work in Heligoland.
"3. Attempt to strengthen personnel of the navy, from
1923.
"4. The activities of Captain Lohmann (founding
of numerous associations at home and abroad,
participations, formation of "sports" unions and clubs,
interesting the film industry in naval recruitment).
"5. Preparation for re-establishing the German U-boat
arm since 1920. (Projects and deliveries for Japan,
Holland, Turkey, Argentine and Finland. Torpedo testing.)
"6. Participation in the preparation for building of
the Luftwaffe (preservation of aerodromes, aircraft
construction, teaching of courses, instruction of
midshipmen in anti-air raid defense, training of
pilots).
"7. Attempt to strengthen the mining branch.
"Part C (1925192. Replacement of Tonnage) Chapter IV.
"(a) The activities of the Inter-allied Control
Commissions (up to 31.1.27; discontinuance of the
activity of the Naval Peace Commission)
"Independent armament measures behind the back of the
Reich Government and legislative bodies up to the
Lohmann case.
"1. The activities of Captain Lohmann (continuation),
their significance as a foundation for the rapid
reconstruction work from 1935.
"2. Preparation for the re-strengthening of the German
U-boat arm from 1925 (continuation), the merit of
Lohmann in connection with the preparation for rapid
construction in 1925, relationship to Spain, Argentine,
Turkey: the first post war U-boat construction of the
German Navy in Spain since 1927; 250 ton specimen in
Finland, preparation for rapid assembly; electric
torpedo; training of U-boat personnel abroad in Spain
and Finland. Formation of U-boat school in 1932
disguised as an anti-U-boat school.
"3. Participation in the preparation for the
reconstruction of the Luftwaffe (continuation).
Preparations for a Naval Air Arm, Finance Aircraft
Company Sevra, later Luftdienst
[Page 429]
CMRH; Naval Flying School Warnemunde; Air Station List,
training of sea cadet candidates, Military tactical
questions "Air Defense Journeys", technical
development, experimental -station planning, trials,
flying boat development DOX etc., catapult aircraft,
arming, engines ground organization, aircraft
torpedoes, the Deutschland Flight 192 and the Seaplane
Race 1926.
"4. Economic re-armament ("the Tebeg"Technical Advice
and Supply Company as a disguised Naval Office abroad
for investigating the position of raw materials for
industrial capacity and other War economic questions.)
"5. Various measures. (The NV Aerogeodetic Company
secret investigations.)
"(c) Planned armament work with the tacit approval of
the Reich government, but behind the backs of the
legislative bodies (1928 to the taking over of power.)
"1. The effect of the Lohmann case on the secret
preparations; winding up of works which could not be
advocated; resumption and carrying on of other work.
"2. Finance question. ("Black Funds" and the Special
Budget).
"3. The Labor Committee and its objectives
"(d) The Question of Marine Attaches (The continuation
under disguise; open re-appointment 1932-1933).
"(e) The question of Disarmament of the Fleet abroad
and in Germany (The Geneva Disarmament Conference 1927;
the London Naval Treaty of 1930; the Anglo-French-
Italian Agreement 1931. The League of Nations
Disarmament Conference 1932).
"Part D 1931939. The Germany Navy during the Military
Freedom Period)
"I. National Socialism and the question of the Fleet
and of prestige at sea.
"II. Incorporation of the navy in the National
Socialist State."
"III. The Re-armament of the Navy under the Direction
of the Reich Government in a Disguised Way." (C-17)
The policy development of the navy is also reflected from
the financial side. The planned organization of the navy
budget for armament measures was based on a co-ordination of
military developments and political objectives. Military
political development was accelerated after the withdrawal
from the League of Nations. (C-17)
[Page 430]
A captured document, entitled "Chef der Marneleitbng,
Berlin, 12 May 1934," and marked "Secret Commando Matter,"
discusses the "Armament Plan (A.P.) for the 3rd Armament
Phase.') (C-153). This document, which bears the facsimile
signature of Raeder at the end, speaks of war tasks, war and
operational plans, armament target, etc., and shows that it
was distributed to many of the High Command of the Navy.
Dated 12 May 1934, it shows that a primary objective was
readiness for a war without any alert period. The following
are pertinent extracts:
***"The planned organization of armament measures is
necessary for the realization of the target; this again
requires a coordinated and planned expenditure in peace
time. This organization of financial measures over a
number of years according to the military viewpoint is
found in the armament program and provides
"a. for the military leaders a sound basis for their
operational considerations and
"b. for the political leaders a clear picture of what
may be achieved with the military means available at a
given time."
"All theoretical and practical A-preparations are to be
drawn up with a primary view to readiness for a war
without any alert period." (C-153)
The conspiratorial nature of these Nazi plans and
preparations long before the outbreak of hostilities is
illustrated in many other ways. Thus, in 1934, Hitler
instructed Raeder to keep secret the U-Boat construction
program; also the actual displacement and speed of certain
ships. Work on U-Boats had been going on, as already
indicated, in Holland and Spain. The Nazi theory was
ingenious in that respect. The Versailles Treaty forbade re-
arming by the Germans in Germany, but the Nazis said it did
not forbid them to re-arm in Holland, Spain, and Finland.
Secrecy was equally important then because of the pending
naval negotiations with England. The subject was discussed
in a conversation between Raeder and Adolf Hitler in June
1934. The record of that conversation (C-189) is not signed
by Raeder, but in an interrogation on 8 November 1945,
Raeder admitted that (C-189) was a record of this
conversation, and that it was in his handwriting, though he
did not sign his name at the end. The report is headed,
"Conversation with the Fuehrer in June 1934 on the occasion
of the resignation of the Commanding Officer of the
Karlsruhe." It reads:
"1. Report by the C-in-C Navy concerning displacement
of D. and E. (defensive weapons).
[Page 431]
! "Fuehrer's instructions: No mention must be made of a
displacement of 25-26,000 tons, but only of improved
10,000-ton -. (ships). Also, the speed over 26 nautical
miles may be stated. ". C-in-C Navy expresses the
opinion that later on the Fleet must anyhow be
developed to oppose England, that therefore -from 1936
onwards, the large ships must be armed with 35 c.m.
guns (Like the King George Class).
"3. The Fuehrer demands to keep the construction of the
U-Boats completely secret. Plebiscite also in
consideration of the Saar." (C-189)
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Volume
I Chapter IX
Preparation for Aggression
1933-1936
(Part 7 of 14)
"The Navy, The Versailles Treaty, Foreign Countries.