Nazi Conspiracy & Aggression F. The Nazi conspirators restricted the independence of the
judiciary and rendered it subservient to their ends.
The independence of judges, before the Nazi regime, was
guaranteed by the Weimar Constitution. The fundamental
principle was stated briefly in Article 102:
"Judges are independent and subject only to the law." (2050-PS)
Article 104 contained a safeguard against the arbitrary
removal or suspension of judges, while Article 105
prohibited "exceptional courts". The fundamental rights of the
individual are set out in Article 109 and include equality
before the law. (2050-PS)
Like all other public officials, German judges who failed to
meet Nazi racial and political requirements became the
subject of a wide-spread purge. Non-Aryans, political
opponents of the Nazis, and all persons suspected of
antagonism to the aims of the Party were summarily
removed (2967-PS). The provisions of the Law for the
Restoration of Professional Civil Service of 7 April 1933
applied to all judges. This was declared expressly in the
third regulation for the administration of the law. (2867-
PS)
To make certain that cases with political ramifications
would be dealt with acceptably and in conformity with Party
principles, the Nazis granted designated areas of criminal
jurisdiction to the so-called Special Courts (Sondergerhte).
These constituted
[Page 227]
a new system of special criminal courts, independent of the
regular judiciary and directly subservient to the Party
(2076-PS). A later decree considerably broadened the
jurisdiction of these -courts. (2056-PS)
In 1934, the People's Court was set up as a trial court "in
cases of high treason and treason" (2014-PS). This action
was a direct result of the dissatisfaction of the Nazi
rulers with the decision of the Supreme Court (Rechsgercht)
in the Reichstag fire trial. Three of the four
defendants were acquitted although the Nazi conspirators had
expected convictions in all cases (2967-PS). The law which
created this new tribunal contained a wide definition of
treason which would include most of what were regarded by
the Nazis as "political" crimes (Art. 3 (1)). The express
denial of any appeal from the decisions of the People's
Court (Art. (2)) was a further indication of the intention
of the Nazis to set up a criminal law system totally outside
of accepted judicial pattern. The substantive organization of the
People's Court was later established by law in 1936. (2342-PS)
These new tribunals were staled almost exclusively with
Nazis and were used to tighten the Party's grip on Germany.
This control became progressively stronger, due first, to
the power of the prosecutor to pick the appropriate court;
second, to the restriction of defense counsel in these
courts to specially admitted attorneys; and finally, to the
absence of appeal from the decisions of these judges.
Moreover, there developed along side of the entire judicial
system the increasingly powerful police administration,
under which persons opposed to the regime were regularly
imprisoned in concentration camps without any type of
hearing, even after acquittal by the courts. (2967-PS)
Still another group of courts was established within the
Party itself. These Party Courts heard cases involving
internal party discipline and infractions of the rules of
conduct prescribed for members of formations and affiliated
organizations. The published rules for the Party judges
emphasized the complete dependence of these judges upon the
directions and supervision of their Party superiors. (2402-PS)
The Nazi legal theorists freely admitted that there was no
place in their scheme of things for the truly independent
judge. They controlled all judges through special directives
and orders from the central government. Frank underscored
the role of the judge as a political functionary and as an
administrator in the National Socialist state (2378-PS). Two
case histories of this period serve to illustrate the manner
in which criminal proceedings were directly suppressed or
otherwise affected by order of the Reich government.
[Page 228]
In 1935, the Reich Governor of Saxony, Mutschmann, attempted
to quash criminal proceedings which, in this exceptional
instance, had been brought against officials of the
Hohnstein concentration camp for a series of extremely
brutal attacks upon inmates. The trial was held and
the defendants convicted, but during the trial the governor
inquired of the presiding judge whether he did not think the
penalty proposed by the prosecutor too severe and whether an
acquittal was not indicated. After the conviction, two
jurymen were ousted from the NSDAP and the prosecutor was
advised by his superior to withdraw from the SA. Although
Guertner, the then Minister of Justice, strongly recommended
against taking any action to alter the decision, Hitler
pardoned all the accused. (783-PS; 784-PS; 785-PS; 786-PS)
In another similar case, Guertner wrote directly to Hitler
narrating the horrible details of maltreatment and advising
that the case be regularly prosecuted. Nevertheless, Hitler
ordered complete suppression of the proceedings. (787-PS;
788-PS)
Under the Nazi regime, it was part of the official duty of
many Party functionaries to supervise the administration of
justice. The official papers of Hess contain detailed
statements concerning his own functions and those of the
Gauleiter in deciding criminal cases. (2639-PS)
Another type of governmental interference in judicial
matters is evidenced by the confidential letter which the
Ministry of Justice sent in early 1938 to the Chief Justices
of the Regional Supreme Courts
(Oberlandesgerichtspraesidenten). The judges were instructed
to submit lists of lawyers who would be sufficiently able and
trustworthy to represent in court persons who had been taken
into "protective custody". The main requirement was absolute
political reliability. Simple Party membership was not enough; to
be selected, the lawyer had to enjoy the confidence of the
"Gestapo". (651-PS)
After the war began, Thierack, Minister of Justice, revealed
the low state to which the judiciary had fallen under Nazis
rule. He argued that the judge was not the "supervisor" but
the "assistant" of the government. He said that the word
"independent", as applied to the judge, was to be eliminated
from the vocabulary and that although the judge should
retain a certain freedom of decision in particular cases,
the government "can and must" give him the "general line" to follow.
For this purpose, Thierack decided in 1942 to send
confidential Judge's Letters (Richterbriefe) to all German
judges and prosecutors, setting forth the political
principles and directives with which all judicial personnel
[Page 229]
were obligated to comply (2482-PS). The first of these
Judge's Letters clearly expresses the complete subordination
of the judges to the Fuehrer and his government. (D-229)
The original plaintext version of
part
one or
part
two of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Volume
I Chapter VII
Means Used by the Nazi Conspiractors in Gaining Control of the German State
(Part 18 of 55)