Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Holocaust Almanac: The "Creative" death certificates Followup-To: alt.revisionism From: Ken McVayOrganization: The Nizkor Project, Canada Keywords: Hadamar Archive/File: places/germany/euthanasia/euthanasia.02 Last-modified: 1994/04/22 "Concerning the `humanity' of this form of killing claimed by Brandt, another man who worked at Hadamar and looked into the gas chamber through a side window spoke of `a horrible sight when the patients gradually collapsed and fell over one another,' and added, `I shall never get this picture out of my mind.<66> We shall find this sequence, including the doctor's central role in it, to be strikingly similar to the killing sequence at Auschwitz. Given the medical cover-up of killing, _every death certificate had to be falsified_. The key principle employed in choosing the false cause of death was medical credibility: assigning a disease consistent with a patient's prior physical and mental state, a disease that he or she _could_ have contracted. Designated causes of death could include almost anything - infectious diseases, pneumonia, diseases of the heart, lung, brain, or other major organs. Skill at this falsification process was an important part of the `medical experience' of the killing doctors, and younger ones learned it during their `training' with their medical superiors and predecessors. To help them, they were given written guides specifiying important details necessary for consistency. One such guide, for instance, focused upon septicemia (bacteria in the bloodstream) as a cause of death, referred to bacterial infection of the skin as a possible source, and listed the sequence of symptoms and therapy to be mentioned. The document included additional useful tips: unclean mental patients often have boils which they scratch; and, `It is most expedient to figure four days for the basic illness [bacterial infection] and five days for the resultant sepsis'; and, this diagnosis `should not be used with patients who are meticulously clean' but `is preferable for young strong patients who smear readily,' but in that case `seven to eight days have to be allowed for the illness to take effect, since their circulation is relatively more resistant.'<67> It is no exageration to say that the primary -- perhaps the only -- _medical_ function of the killing doctors was to determine the most believable falsification of each patient-victim's death certificate. Maintaining these medical illusions required an extensive bureaucracy of deception. Every falsification in this `bloated apparatus' had to be `covered by two more.' For instance, at each killing center, there was a `Special Registry Office,' which had a subdivision whose specific task it was to determine a suitable death date for each patient. On the death certificate prepared by the doctor, the date of death was always omitted, to be provided by this department. On the basis of its `timecards' and `death files,' it could prevent the recording of large numbers of deaths at a particular place during a particular time sequence.<68> <66> Note: I overlooked inclusion of this end-note when I first transcribed the material - if anyone has Lifton's book handy, I'd appreciate it if they would send me the correct citation. knm. <67> Heyde Trial, pp. 396-99; see also pp. 399-406 <68> Ernst Klee, "Tot und seziert" [65], pp. 409-16; Klee, "Euthanasia"[3] p. 344 Extracted from--------------------------------------------------- THE NAZI DOCTORS: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. Lifton, Robert Jay, London: Papermac, 1986 (Reprinted 1990) -----------------------------------------------------------------
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.