From Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk Fri Mar 8 06:37:33 PST 1996 Article: 26562 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!laslo.netnet.net!en.com!in-news.erinet.com!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk From: "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL"Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: 3) ARTICLE BY CARLO MATTOGNO part -3 Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 23:10:54 GMT Organization: None Lines: 171 Message-ID: <674446016wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stumpy.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Thursday, Mar 07, 1996 23.10.54 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk 6) Number of Hungarian Jews who arrived at Auschwitz in May 1944. The report of Lieutenant Colonel Laszlo Ferenczy dated 29 May 1944 states that from the beginning of the deportation until midnight on 28 May 1944, there were 184,049 Jews deported to Auschwitz from Hungary in 58 trains. (29) As the first convoys had left on 15 May, the deportation took place within fourteen days. If we apply Pressac's "rule", out of 184,049 deportees, approximately 122,700 persons were unable to work, and as such were homicidally gassed. Since the first convoys which had left on 15 May arrived at Auschwitz on 17 May, (30) and if the duration of the journey was two days, then 184,049 deported Hungarian Jews arrived at Auschwitz within a period of 14 days, between 17 May and 30 May. The average number of alleged homicidally gassed people would then be (122,700 / 14 =) 8,764 per day. If, on the contrary, the last deportations arrived at Auschwitz on 31 May, the average number of presumed homicidally gassed persons, would be 8,180 per day. 7) The Aerial Reconnaissance Photographs of 31 May 1944: Jean-Claude Pressac bases his case on three presuppositions: a) On 30 May, 1944, only one convoy of Hungarian Jews arrived at Birkenau (1,000 able and 2,000 unable to work). On 31 May, two convoys arrived (2,000 able and 4,000 unable to work). b) The photographs taken on 31 May show only six or seven cars on the ramp, so the above-mentioned convoys had not yet arrived. c) Aerial reconnaissance photographs show that a cremation is taking place in one of the three pits measuring 3.5 by 15 meters in the Crematory V courtyard. Let's analyze these presuppositions, one at a time: a) The existing documents allow us to trace the deportation of the Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz at the end of May 1944, according to the following table: DATE.......................................... 25 May 1944 Number of Deportees.........................138,870 (31) Total Number of Trains................................44 Partial Number of Deportees........................./ Average Daily Number of Deportees............/ Partial Number of Trains................................/ DATE........................................... 28 May 1944 Number of Deportees..........................184,049 (32) Total Number of Trains.................................58 Partial Number of Deportees................45,179 Average Daily Number of Deportees...15,060 Partial Number of Trains..............................14 DATE........................................... 31 May 1944 Number of Deportees..........................217,236 (33) Total Number of Trains.................................69 Partial Number of Deportees................33,187 Average Daily Number of Deportees...11,062 Partial Number of Trains...............................11 As for the Hungarian Jews who arrived at Auschwitz on 31 May 1944, there are two possibilities: 1) If the journey lasted from one to three days, on 31 May, three or four convoys arrived at Auschwitz which had departed on May 28, 29, or 30; so the number of deportees is 9,051 (34) (three convoys) or 12,068 (35) (four convoys). 2) If the journey lasted from four to six days (less probable hypothesis), on 31 May, four or five convoys arrived, and they had departed on the 26th, 27th or 28th; so the number of the deportees calculates to 12,908 (36) (four convoys) or 16,135 (37) (five convoys). As to the 29th, 30th, and 31st of May, a total of eleven convoys had left Hungary; three on one day, and four on the other two days. With the hypothesis that the duration of the journey has been one or three days, if on 31 May, three convoys arrived (9,051 deportees); on 30 May, four arrived (12,908 deportees), and vice-versa. In the hypothesis that the journey lasted more than three days, the number of deportee arrivals on 30 May and on 31 May would be much bigger. In conclusion, either on 30 May approximately 12,900 deportees arrived and on 31 May approximately 9,050 arrived; or on 30 May approximately 9,050 deportees arrived and on 31 May approximately 12,900 arrived. b) After clearing this point, we go to Pressac's second presupposition. He states that the two aerial photographs of 31 May 1944 were taken at around 9 to 10 A.M., which is very probable because the shadows of the chimneys of the crematories face North-West with a 315 degree angle. Also the presence of seven cars on the Birkenau ramp is an exact observation (but on the old ramp there are at least eight trains, and nine or ten trains in the Auschwitz station). But all this does not rule out that the convoys had arrived during the night or early in the morning, and that they had already left. Let's remember that according to Lieutenant Colonel Ferenczy, the convoys will continue their journey just after assignment selection at the Birkenau ramp. That problem is nevertheless not essential. The really serious problems are the following: 1) How would it have been technically possible to homicidally gas and cremate 122,700 people in not more than fifteen days in facilities that could have cremated no more than a maximum of (1,400 * 15 =) 21,000 cadavers? 2) How could it have been technically possible to homicidally gas and cremate no less than (9,050 * 2/3 =) 6,000 people on about the 30th of May 1944 with facilities which in one day could just cremate a maximum of 1,400 cadavers? 3) Why in the aerial photographs of 31 May 1944, is there no trace of cremation of the remaining (6,000 - 1,400 =) 4,600 cadavers? 4) If the story of extermination were true, the Birkenau facilities should have had a cremation capacity not less than 10,000 cadavers per day (two-thirds of the deportees arrived at Auschwitz with convoys which had left Hungary on 26, 27, and 28 May, 1944). So in the aerial photographs of 31 May, the alleged "cremation pits" ought to be visible, with an area of approximately 2,800 square meters (calculated according to the declaration by Filip Mller). But there is no trace of them at all! The small column of smoke rising from the courtyard near Crematory V which appears in the aerial photographs of May 31, 1944 is consistent with outside trash incineration in an open-air container where lower level combustion air is able to enter; we know of no aerial photographic evidence of pit incineration, where burning would have been very slow because of poor air circulation. And this brings us to Jean-Claude Pressac's last presupposition: the presence, in those photographs, of three "cremation pits" measuring 3.5 15 meters, and of one such pit in which a cremation is taking place. Where did Pressac see these? We wait with confidence that he publish these two pictures. But why did he not present them in his book Le macchine dello sterminio? And with the exact indication of: three "cremation pits" of 52.5 square meters each; approximately 100 cubic meters of soil extracted from pits and piled up next to each pit on an area at least equal to that of these alleged pits; 250 to 500 tons of wood piled up as cadaver cremation fuel for the cremation of the cadavers of the alleged homicidally gassed from 31 May; piles equal to approximately 550 to 1,100 cubic meters, and of an area approximately 220 to 440 square meters (assuming the height of a pile of 2.5 meters); the exact location of a "cremation pit" with smoke; the exact location of where there is a "cremation pit" of 30 square meters, and another one of 20 square meters in the area of Bunker 2. It is clear that we are challenging Jean-Claude Pressac. This article appears on the CODOH website:- check out Brad's website on:- http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ CODOH PO BOX 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Also by Carlo Mattogno: AUSCHWITZ:The End of a Legend available from the Institute of Historical Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. -- Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the mountains of truth you never climb in vain. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk Fri Mar 8 06:37:35 PST 1996 Article: 26563 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!laslo.netnet.net!en.com!in-news.erinet.com!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk From: "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: AUSCHWITZ COMMANDER LEARNT ENGLISH IN TWO WEEKS! Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 22:46:26 GMT Organization: None Lines: 62 Message-ID: <444142592wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stumpy.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Thursday, Mar 07, 1996 22.46.26 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk Auschwitz commander, Hoess said in a statement that 7000 SS men had served at Auschwitz. [most were sent to the front] and he had to have this translated into German. He signed his name correctly with those funny German characters, the o with the two vertical lines above it and the double s. [eg Ho"B] [Document 749(b)-D IMT XXXV.] However he understood fluent English, ["I understand English as it written above"] when he confessed to having killed 3,000,000 people at Auschwitz of the 4 million that were sent there, in his statement 15 days later, on the 5th of April 1946. [document 3868-PS. IMT XXXIII] Hoess MUST have learnt fluent English in 15 days. It's possible. However his estimate, was a bit out. Still, he "revised" it later, down to 1,135,000 people. Pity that the Auschwitz Museum says that slightly over a million people were sent there. But learning English has it's drawbacks. Ho"B forgot his German. He mispelt his own name on every page of his confession. [Still who cares about the german funny o or double s] Read MADE IN RUSSIA - THE HOLOCAUST by Carlos Whitlock Porter available from :- The Institute of Historical Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the mountains of truth you never climb in vain. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk Fri Mar 8 06:37:35 PST 1996 Article: 26578 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!helix.net!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!news1.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk From: "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: 3) THEY COMMITTED PERJURY REPEATEDLY Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 23:31:28 GMT Organization: None Lines: 56 Message-ID: <470984530wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stumpy.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Thursday, Mar 07, 1996 23.31.28 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk 13. In the courtroom were Polish, Jugoslav and Jewish prisoners as spectators, who served as an information bureau, that is , during the court recesses they told their comrades, who were waiting for their interrogation everything that had been discussed during the course of the trial. On the basis of this information the latter were then able to reinforce the accusations and bring to naught the exoneration, which was scanty enough anyway. For this reason it was also possible to always bring out the same points in the accusations. 14. The questionaires we had filled out were handed to the persecution witnesses by the prosecutor or by his interpreter. In this way each exact date could be looked up in order to incriminate the accused without having to fear a false statement was being made. In spite of this, it happened that they contradicted themselves in cross-examination. However, because the witnesses were under the protection of the American court, they had nothing to fear from perjury, which they committed repeatedly. 15. We, as accused, had no right to give our opinion. At the beginning of the trial the defense lawyer told us we had to keep quite still and the questions we wanted to have put to the witnesses we were to write on paper and give to his interpreter, Mr. BARR. I did not understand most of the trial, since I am a Lithuanian and only know a little German. I had to find out during the court recesses, from my comrades, of what I was accused. 17. [sic] There was no final argument by the defense lawyer. I was sentenced to death on 21 August 1947. The sentence was approved on 26th June 1948. Landsberg/Lech, 1O September 1948 /s/ Gustav Perat. Perats statement is cited on Pages 258 to 263 in Innocent at Dachau by Joseph Halow.] INNOCENT AT DACHAU is available from:- The Institute of Historical Review PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA. -- Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the mountains of truth you never climb in vain. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk Fri Mar 8 06:37:36 PST 1996 Article: 26579 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!helix.net!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!news1.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk From: "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: 4) ARTICLE BY CARLO MATTOGNO part -4 Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 23:20:08 GMT Organization: None Lines: 297 Message-ID: <557965135wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stumpy.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Thursday, Mar 07, 1996 23.20.08 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk THE STATISTICS BY JEAN-CLAUDE PRESSAC In Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, Jean-Claude Pressac mentions 938,000 victims cremated in the Auschwitz-Birkenau installations, distributed as we presented on page 28 in our critique, Auschwitz: The End of a Legend. But in the Preface of Beate and Serge Klarsfeld to the former work, they summed up the results of the article by Georges Wellers previously cited, Essai de dtermination du nombre de morts au camp d'Auschwitz, which we summarize in the following table: Total number of deportees 1,613,455..........of whom 1,433,405....[were] Jews Total dead 1,471,595..........of whom 1,352,980....[were] Jews Total gassed 1,334,700..........of whom 1,323,000....[were] Jews. (38) Pressac proposes the numbers 938,000 or 900,000 (39) without any explanation. The only sure thing is that while for G. Wellers the Hungarian Jews who were homicidally gassed numbered approximately 410,000, for Pressac they are 200,000 to 250,000. (40) As a consequence of this, the number of Jews who were gassed ought to be lowered to 1,113,000. So just what is the basis for Pressac's calculations? In Les crematoires d'Auschwitz (p.148), Pressac proposes a new statistic on the basis of research by Franciszek Piper, (41) but with a "correction" relative to the number of Polish Jews deported to Auschwitz. F. Piper states that the total of Jews deported to Auschwitz-Birkenau was 1,095,190, (42) of whom, approximately 205,000 were registered and the remaining 890,000 were unregistered. (43) The number of Jews killed was a total of 960,000 of whom 95,000 were registered and 865,000 unregistered. (44) Pressac starts with the total of deported Jews, who he rounds off to 1,095,200 and reduces from 300,000 to 150,000 the number of Jews deported >from Poland. Besides that, he assumes that 118,000 Hungarian Jews were transferred from Auschwitz Birkenau. In such a way, he has 827,200 deportees >from whom he subtracts the registered 200,000, (45) reaching a final count of 630,000 homicidally gassed (p.148). He sums up the total of the victims in the following table (p.148): Non-registered gassed Jews............................630,000 Registered detainees who died........................130,000 (Jews and non-Jews) Soviet Prisoners of War.....................................15,000 Total...................................................................775, 000 The reason for the reduction of the number of Jews deported out of Poland >from 300,000 to 150,000 presented by Pressac has not any historical foundation, but a technical one: He states that the number of the gassed indicated in the Auschwitz Kalendarium in the first six days of August 1943 (convoys from Bendsburg and Sosnowitz), an average of 4,000 per day, is excessive because at that time only Crematories III and V were functioning with an incinerating capacity of 1,500 cadavers per day; so the number of Jews for each convoy has been " mal estim " (estimated incorrectly) by the witnesses. But on the contrary, it has been doubled because the percentage of the registered deportees was 30% to 35% of the approximately 50,000 registered Polish Jews, corresponding to approximately 150,000 deportees "soit une centaine de convois de 1.500 personnes" (that is approximately one hundred convoys containing 1,500 people) (p.147). According to the Auschwitz Kalendarium, during the first six days of August 1943, from Bendsburg and Sosnowitz, 28,000 Jews were deported to Auschwitz (approximately 5,800 of whom were registered, and 22,200 homicidally gassed) in 12 convoys; an approximate average of 2,300 people per convoy. This number represents approximately 9% of the total number of Polish Jews deported to Auschwitz according to F. Piper (300,000). So Pressac erroneously attributes to the remaining 91%, the presumed exaggeration of the number of Jews present in each convoy which would be valid only for 9%. We also take note that in Pressac's calculation, the number of alleged homicidally gassed Hungarian Jews, which in Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers was 200,000 to 250,000, now becomes 320,000. In Le macchine dello sterminio (p.173), Pressac reduces even more the number of deportees and deceased. He starts out also in this regard with the number of deportees indicated by F. Piper (1,095,190 or 1,095,200), from which he subtracts incorrectly 150,000 deportees from Poland, just as in the previous case; but he also reduces from 438,000 to 240,000, the number of Hungarian Jews deported to Auschwitz; thereby obtaining 667,200 to 747,200 deportees: 1,095,200 - 150,000 - (438,000 - 160,000) = 667,200; 1,095,200 - 150,000 - (438,000 - 240,000) = 747,200. Jean-Claude Pressac rounds out these figures to 670,000 and 750,000, subtracting the 200,000 registered from them, he obtains 470,000 to 550,000 homicidally gassed Jews. He puts the total death count as follows: Non-registered Jews who were gassed...........470,000 to 550,000 Deceased registered Detainees.......................126,000 - (Jews and non-Jews) Soviet Prisoners of War.....................................15,000 - Miscellaneous (Gypsies etc.)............................20,000 - Total ..................................................................631,000 to 711,000 In the calculation of the total death count, Pressac does not take into consideration Jewish detainees who were transferred to other concentration camps. The Hungarian Jews transferred from the Durchgangslager must be included in this category. As we have seen, Pressac estimates that at least 80,000 Hungarian Jews escaped homicidal gassing; 28,000 of those registered at Auschwitz, and 52,000 who were not registered and were transferred to other camps. Those must be subtracted from the 670,000 to 750,000 alleged homicidally gassed who were unregistered. So the Pressac number of alleged homicidally gassed Jews would be between 418,000 to 498,000. We also take note that Pressac has also changed once again the number of alleged homicidally gassed Hungarian Jews, now putting it at 80,000 to 160,000. Before presenting our conclusion, we summarize in a synoptic table, Jean-Claude Pressac regarding Jews he alleges were homicidally "gassed" at Auschwitz: Year 1989: 938,000 -of whom 200,000 to 250,000 were Hungarian Jews. Year 1993: 630,000 - of whom 320,000 were Hungarian Jews. Year 1994: 550,000 - of whom 80,000 to 160,000 to 470,000 were Hungarian Jews. So, from 1989 to 1994, Jean-Claude Pressac has thus reduced the number of homicidally gassed Jews by 50% from 938,000 to 470,000! Our study, Auschwitz: The End of a Legend concludes with the observation that since Jean-Claude Pressac wanted to study the question of Auschwitz in a technical manner, he had to accept revisionist methodology, according to which, where testimony and technology disagree, it is technology which prevails. Pressac has applied this principle by reducing the number of alleged victims of alleged homicidal gassing, precisely because of its incompatibility with the capacity (craftily inflated by him) of the crematory ovens. In this manner, he has opened an irreparable leak in traditional historiography, because technology reveals the material impossibility of mass extermination at Auschwitz-Birkenau. If therefore, Pressac wants to be coherent in his technical stance, all that remains for him is to accept this conclusion. If he does not accept it, he can only go backwards, declaring, in acceptance of that appeal of those French historians, that one must not inquire as to how such alleged mass extermination was technically possible (p.90). In Le macchine dello sterminio, Jean-Claude Pressac has gone one step further towards this conclusion. Pressac has understood that extermination of the Hungarian Jews would have also been technically impossible on the basis of the huge cremation capacity that he attributed to the Birkenau facilities; but he did not want to draw the extreme consequences from such an acknowledgment. To pull himself out of trouble, he had only two ways out: either increase cremation capacity, or diminish the number of deportees. Pressac chose the second option. The drastic reduction of deported Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz has become such a tactical requirement for Jean-Claude Pressac, which cannot be set aside; an unrenouncable way out; an illusory game by which he would make the impossible possible. Because Pressac's "revision" has no historical foundation, but is merely tactical, his statistics-the instruments for his illusory game-are inevitably arbitrary and unfounded. >From a strictly historiographical point of view, Jean-Claude Pressac seems to be torn between two contradictory necessities: one being the technical, which rationally pushes him to negation of extermination of the Jews at Auschwitz, and the other being the dogmatic one about the holocaustic religion, which fiercely opposes such denial. It is difficult to predict which one of these two necessities will prevail in the end, but Pressac's continual "revisions" gives us good hope. One thing is certain: If Jean-Claude Pressac wants to go on - even by small steps - through the technical way in which he started, we could expect at least more reductions in the numbers of homicidally "gassed" people at Auschwitz. NOTES 1. The study Auschwitz: Fine di una leggenda was written in October of 1993 and Pressac received a copy of the text from the author by the end of February 1994. 2. J.C. Pressac, Le macchine dello sterminio. Auschwitz 1942-1945. Feltrinelli, Milano, October 1994. 3. Printing error: read 438,000. 4. Report of 9 July 1944, T-1322. 5. Typographical error [from Pressac]; read 438,000. 6. Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau, published in: Hefte von Auschwitz, Wydawnictwo Pa_stwowego Muzeum w O_wi_cimiu, Hefte 2, 1959; 3, 1960; 4, 1961; 6, 1962; 7 and 8, 1964. 7. See the complete list of the convoys in our study, Wellers e i "gasati" di Auschwitz, Edizioni La Sfinge, Parma, March, 1987, pp. 51-54. 8. Hefte von Auschwitz, 7, p. 91 ff. 9. Le Monde Juif, October-December 1983, Nr. 112, pp. 127-159. 10. This figure is mentioned in the telegram from E. Veesenmayer dated 11 July 1944, NG-5615. 11. G. Wellers, Essai de dtermination..., art. cit., pp. 147, 153. 12. Le procs de Jrusalem. Jugement-Documents. Introduction de Lon Poliakov. Calman-Lvy, Paris 1963, p. 199. 13. Wellers e i "gasati" di Auschwitz, op. cit., pp.18-20, 37, 39. 14. Danuta Czech, Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945. Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbeck bei Hamburg, 1989. 15. Idem., p.699. 16. Idem., pp.777 ff. 17. Wellers e i "gasati" di Auschwitz is one of our five studies which are cited by J.C. Pressac in the bibliography which appears on page 564 of his book, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, published by The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York, 1989. 18. The report by E. von Thadden of 26 May 1944 [NG-2190] states that one-third of the deported Jews from Hungary were able to work (see below). Pressac has erected this into a "rule" which he observed in relation to 116,000 deportees. 19. NG-5573. 20. NG-2190, p.2. 21. Idem., pp.4-5. 22. T-1319 (text in Hungarian). 23. Printing mistakes: Read 30 May; also the three citations after 21 May are wrong: the correct date is 31 May. 24. The question of cremation capacity of the crematory ovens at Auschwitz-Birkenau is presented in our articleDie Krematoriumsfen von Auschwitz-Birkenau, in the anthology entitled Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte, edited by Ernst Gaus, and published in 1994 by the Grabert Verlag, Tuebingen, Germany, 1994, pp. 281-320. 25. The absurdities expressed in this regard by this " eye-witness" have been analyzed and disproved in the cited essay Die Krematoriumsfen von Auschwitz-Birkenau, op. cit., pp. 317-318. 26. Filip Mller, Sonderbehandlung. Drei Jahre in den Krematorien und Gaskammern von Auschwitz. Verlag Steinhausen, Mnchen, 1979, pp. 207, 211. of these alleged five crematory pits (total approximate area: 1,800 square meters) in the Allied reconnaissance photographs taken on 31 May 1944, as Pressac reduces these alleged pits from five, down to three, and the area >from 1,800 down to 157.5 square meters. 27. Filip Mller declares that in a 40 or 50 meter by 8 meter pit, averaging 360 square meters in area, they cremated 1,200 cadavers in three layers placed one upon another, alternating three layers of wood. [Sonderbehandlung, op. cit., p.219]. The calculation would therefore be this: [(1,200 360) 157.5] = 525. 28. Miklos Nyiszli, Auschwitz: A Doctor's Eyewitness Account, Fawcett Crest, New York, 1961, pp. 70, 71. 29. T-1319. 30. According to the Auschwitz Kalendarium (1989), the first three convoys would have arrived at Auschwitz on 16 May, and all the deportees would have been homicidally gassed [op. cit., p.776]. This piece of information, based exclusively on declarations given after the war, is completely untrustworthy: the duration of the journeyonly one dayis too short, and the complete lack of anyone at all who could work, is too unlikely among three convoys sent to Auschwitz in order to be selected for labor. 31. NG-5608 32. T-1319 33. NG-5623 34. 33,187 * 11 = 3,017 persons per each convoy. 3,017 3 = 9,051 persons. 35. 3,017 * 4 = 12,068 persons. 36. 45,179 / 14 = 3,227 deportees per each train; 3,227 4 = 12,908 37. 3,227 * 5 = 16,135 38. J.C. Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, op. cit., p. 13. 39. Idem. p.97. 40. Idem. p. 253. 41. Franciszek Piper, Estimating the Number of Deportees to and Victims of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp. Yad Vashem Studies, XXI (Jerusalem 1991, pp.49-103); Auschwitz, Wie viele Juden, Polen, Zigeuner...wurden umgebracht. Krakow, Universitas, 1992. 42. Franciszek Piper, Estimating the Number of Deportees to and Victims of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp, art. cit., p.99. 43. Idem., S.97. 44. Idem., S.98. 45. F. Piper puts the count at 200,000 to 205,000 This article appears on the CODOH website:- check out Brad's website on:- http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ CODOH PO BOX 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Also by Carlo Mattogno: AUSCHWITZ:The End of a Legend available from the Institute of Historical Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. -- Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the mountains of truth you never climb in vain. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk Fri Mar 8 06:37:37 PST 1996 Article: 26580 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!helix.net!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!news1.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk From: "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: 2) ONE WAS CUT OFF FROM THE OUTSIDE WORLD...... Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 23:27:32 GMT Organization: None Lines: 46 Message-ID: <595795548wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stumpy.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Thursday, Mar 07, 1996 23.27.32 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk 9. On 15th July 1947 I recieved a general charge sheet and was transferred with my co-accused to the Bunker I, camp Dachau. It was impossible for me to procure any exonerating material there. One was cut off from the outside world. Letters to relatives or acquaintances in which something was said about witnesses or the approaching trial were so cut up that the receiver received only scraps from which he could glean nothing. For that reason it was made impossible for me to procure any defense material. Requests for special letters to witnesses or prior reports to the defense lawyer were fruitless. Already in little things they were making the procuring of exonerating material impossible. Also the time before the beginning of the trial was far too short to obtain any material. 10. On 6 August 1947 the trial began, and lasted until 21 August. 11. The prosecution witnesses had every support of the prosecuting authorities. When they were shown to be lying, up jumped the prosecutor, Mr. Lindberg, and accused the defense lawyer of intimidating the witnesses and trying to make out that they were liars. 12. In reality, the opposite was the truth. Defense witnesses were intimidated by the braying of the prosecutor or were branded as false. It happened that defense witnesses were threatened and beaten by foreign former prisoners so that the former had no more interest in appearing for the defense. They were afraid that they too would be accused of something, which the foreign prisoners were quite capable of, as they hated everything German and were out for revenge. Perats statement is cited on Pages 258 to 263 in Innocent at Dachau by Joseph Halow.] INNOCENT AT DACHAU is available from:- The Institute of Historical Review PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA. -- Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the mountains of truth you never climb in vain. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk Fri Mar 8 06:37:38 PST 1996 Article: 26581 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!helix.net!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!news1.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!stumpy.demon.co.uk From: "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL" Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: 1) AND ONLY AFTER REPEATED BLOWS..DID I PUT MY NAME TO IT Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 00:42:12 GMT Lines: 127 Message-ID: <826245406.5212.0@stumpy.demon.co.uk> References: <4eiiv5$ab2@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com> <4g05do$j82@henry.netaxis.com> <4g4lgk$593g@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <3126E65B.7BBD@netvoyage.net> <4ga7k3$a8p@resunix.ri.sickkids.on.ca> <31292CEA.5E78@netvoyage.net> <4ghkvb$5gv@news.ios.com> <4gvlal$qco@shiva.usa.net> Message-ID: <182323855wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> Date: Thursday, Mar 07, 1996 23.25.48 Organization: None Reply-To: Jeff@stumpy.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 Lines: 119 Petrat's post-conviction plea was in the case file, a forlorn voice from the grave which I read with pangs of sorrow. His statement had been prepared in German had been submitted to the Military Governor of the US Zone of Occupation in English translation. Since no more than a handful of Americans have seen this or any other German "war criminal's" side of the story, I reproduce it in its entirety, as follows: I, Gustav PETRAT, born 12 November 1924 in Wirballen/Litauen [Lithuania], presently in Landsberg/Lech, make the following sworn statement after I have been informed that this statement is to be submitted to the Military Governor of the US Zone and that an false statement may be severely punished. l. In May 1944, on account of my wound, I was transferred to the guard personnel of the Mauthausen concentration camp and served there as dog leader with the 16th Guard Company. My rank was Corporal (Rottenfuehrer) in the Armed (Waffen) SS. 2. On 10 May 1945, I was taken prisoner by American soldiers in Reid near Mauthausen and taken to the Tittling camp. When I got there I was mistreated with whips, fists and feet, as was the general custom at that time for newly arrived prisoners. 3. Like many others I was quartered in a potato patch in the open air, so that we all were exposed to the weather. The first three days we received nothing to eat, and from the fourth day on they gave us one loaf of bread for every 20 prisoners and 1 litre of soup for every two men. Under these conditions I lived for some weeks until I was totally undernourished, so that it was hardly possible for me to move from the spot. 4. On 26 May 1945 I had my first interrogation there, which was one of the most memorable of my entire captivity. Even before they asked me the first Question, they struck me so that I collapsed. After I had managed to stagger upright again in spite of my weak condition and aided by the necessary kicks >from the interrogator, the real interrogation began. They asked me questions that I could not have answered if I had the best will in the world to do so. I was to state where the leader of the Mauthausen Concentration Camp was. It was impossible for me to give the information, since I really didn't know, and, as a little corporal I couldn't know. My reply loosed a hail of blows. The second question concerned myself. They asked me how many prisoners I had shot and beaten, to which I replied truthfully and with a clean conscience, "Not one." Then the interrogator drew a pistol and threatened to kill me if I did not tell the truth, immediately. He meant, however, that I should be hanged. I told him again that I only spoke the truth and he could kill me if he wanted to, that at least I would be freed from the whole mess. Then more blows, and with a push in the small of the back I fled [sic]. 5. On 9 May 1945 I was taken to the Moosburg internment camp with about 80 other prisoners. On 7 September 1945 I had my second interrogation, in Moosburg, at which they asked me the same questions they asked in the Tittling camp. There too, I received blows from a whip. This consisted of a wooden handle about 30 cm long to which leather straps had been fastened. Since I had to answer the questions in the negative, they told me that there were other ways and means to force me to tell the truth. Then the interrogator left the room for a few minutes, and returned with a second interrogator. Since I had to reply to this man's questions in the negative also, because I did not know of any killing, he struck me with his fists and threatened to "hang" and "shoot" me. After I stuck to my guns, I was taken back to my quarters. On 10 February 1946 I was transferred to the Dachau internment camp. 6. There I was interrogated two times At the interrogation on 21 June 1946 they read statements to me that said that I had shot eight prisoners in the Mauthausen concentration camp. I was to sign this, but I vigorously refused because I never shot a prisoner After repeated requests to sign, I was struck with fists and kicked with feet. They put a paper in front of me to sign in which it said that l had never been beaten by American interrogators and soldiers. I refused, and only after repeated blows, with the threat that I would never leave the room alive until I had signed, and that they would know how to break me down my obstinacy, did I put my name to it. I had never had anything to do with the court in my life and I was afraid that they would make my life even more difficult. 7. In January 1947 the so-called "line-ups" commenced in Dachau Special Camp. I was confronted with prisoners three times, yet not one accused me of the least thing. The man in charge of the line-up, Mr. ENTRESS, told the prisoners that I was said to have shot many and beaten them to death, where at only a burst of laugher arose. At that time I was 22 years old. When I was 19.5 I came to Mauthausen as dog-leader. A former prominent prisoner, Dr. SANNER, asserted he did not know me, but if a dog-leader had beaten prisoners to death or shot them that would certainly have become known in the camp. Many other former long-term prisoners joined in this exonerating testimony 8. At mid-July 1947 I and my seven co-accused were presented for the first time to our official defence lawyer, Major William A.OATES. To his question whether I knew what I was accused of, and by whom, I could only reply that I was not conscious of any guilt and also had never counted on being brought to trial, since I had never mistreated or killed anyone. Major OATES told me that he too, knew nothing, that he could not get a glimpse of the incriminating papers of the prosecution, and therefore he would have to go by my statements, the general charge sheet, and the testimony of the prosecution witnesses at the trial. Since only the prosecution had access to the records, my lawyer did not see them, and so naturally it was very difficult for him to prepare a defence. Major OATES promised to do everything he could. Also I gave him the names of the witnesses who were important for me, and who themselves were interned in Dacha. Perats statement is cited on Pages 258 to 263 in Innocent at Dachau by Joseph Halow.] INNOCENT AT DACHAU is available from:- The Institute of Historical Review PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA. -- Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the mountains of truth you never climb in vain. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.