Archive/File: holocaust/deniers wmm.1294
Last-Modified: 1994/10/29

Article 20044 of alt.revisionism:
Path: oneb!hakatac!news.bc.net!news.mic.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!swiss.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: wmmichael@aol.com (Wm Michael)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: The Top Ten Net Mythologists
Date: 14 Dec 1994 20:05:29 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 30
Sender: news@newsbf01.news.aol.com
Message-ID: <3co4op$kvd@newsbf01.news.aol.com>
References: <12DEC94.11353106.0082@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf01.news.aol.com

In article <12DEC94.11353106.0082@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA>, Keith Morrison
 writes:


>I think that this indicates the honesty (or lack thereof) inherent
in the Official Milton J. Kleim Jr. Poll of People He Does Not Like.
The eye Weekly poll did not hide the fact that anti-revisionists
were polled, so I do not think Miltie need try to give his poll an
aura of greater respectibility by claiming that revisionists AND
lurkers of all viewpoints were polled since that is obviously
impossible for the reasons I have outlined above.<

>As to the final evaluation of the alleged poll, the results are
somewhat ambiguous.  Did Ken McVay and Danny Keren finish so low
because of their effectiveness in destroying revisionist arguments?
Why did Miltie apparently lie when he could have just stated that
this was his own personal view on how we ranked?  And why is Mike
Stein so damn popular?  First McGuire then Miltie.  I bet you're
just underwhelmed there, Mike.<

Well, I for one received Milton's request to rank the "net mythologists",
and I recall that it had a lot of "To:s" and "cc:s". And, yes I sent mine
in. So I know that he received some replies. 

Why disparage someone for what the exterminationists did themselves? 
Perhaps you should look in the mirror once in awhile, and repeat "I will
be truthful."

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor