Archive/File: orgs/american/ihr/jhr jhr.v13n4 From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail Fri Sep 3 16:36:36 PDT 1993 Article: 3553 of alt.revisionism Xref: oneb soc.history:15552 alt.censorship:12608 alt.activism:26830 alt.revisionism:3553 alt.discrimination:8437 alt.conspiracy:19010 talk.politics.misc:91885 Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail From: dgannon@techbook.techbook.com (Dan Gannon) Newsgroups: soc.history,alt.censorship,alt.activism,alt.revisionism,alt.discrimination,alt.conspiracy,soc.ethics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politcs.mideast Subject: Stick-wielding Jewish Thugs Attack Revisionists, Wound 2 Policemen. Date: 3 Sep 1993 02:16:06 -0700 Organization: TECHbooks - Public Access Lines: 82 Message-ID: <26720m$adt@techbook.techbook.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: techbook.techbook.com >From _The Journal of Historical Review_, Vol. 13, Number 4 (July/Aug. 1993): New Attack Against Faurisson and Rami in Stockholm Even before he arrived in Stockholm in late May, French professor and revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson was expecting trouble. This would be his third visit to the Swedish capital at the invitation of Moroccan-born refugee, author and revisionist activist Ahmed Rami. A few days earlier, the militant Jewish organization "Betar" had announced in Paris that it would try to stop Faurisson's arrival in Sweden even "by force." (_La Lettre de Magazine Hebdo_, May 21, p. 4.) Accordingly, 30 Jews flew from Paris to Stockholm on May 21 to oppose Faurisson's visit to Sweden. On May 22, when Faurisson and Rami arrived at the (supposedly secret) site in Stockholm where a private meeting of revisionists was to take place, they first parked 300 yards away. A waiting mob of about 30 stick-wielding thugs recognized Rami and Faurisson, and began pelting the car with stones they had brought along in sacks for the occasion. Fortunately, the two revisionists were not injured, and damage to the car was slight. The thugs, all wearing hoods to hide their identity, then attacked other revisionists at the meeting site. In the ensuing assault, which forced the cancellation of the meeting, the hoodlums wounded two plainclothes policemen. Four of the attackers -- one French Jew and three Swedish Jews -- were arrested. This was Faurisson's third visit to Stockholm at Rami's invitation. During the first, a gang of thugs attacked Faurisson, Rami and two young Swedes on March 17, 1992. One of the young Swedes was seriously injured, while the others were able to flee. The thugs also broke windows of the meeting site. Police who were present refused to intervene. (For more about this, see the _IHR Newsletter_, May 1992.) Faurisson's second visit in December 1992 took place without trouble. On September 16, 1989, Faurisson was attacked and nearly killed by three men who were later described by police investigators as "young Jewish activists from Paris." Revisionism is rapidly gaining support in Scandinavia, Faurisson and Rami report. Jewish organizations in Europe are particularly furious these days because Rami and his many Swedish friends recently completed a successful mass distribution of 260,000 copies of an effective revisionist leaflet. Rami's address at the October 1992 IHR Conference will appear in a forthcoming issue of the _Journal_. [end of article] [Reprinted by permission from _The Journal of Historical Review_, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA. Subscription rate: $40 per year, domestic. $50 per year, foreign.] This article was manually transcribed by the System Operator of the "Banished CPU" computer bulletin board system, which is located in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Banished CPU supports Freedom of Speech! ___________________________________________________________ | | | For 300-9600 bps (3 lines w/V.32) call: (503) 232-5783 | | For 14400 bps (2 lines w/V.32bis) call: (503) 232-6566 | |___________________________________________________________| Sysop: Maynard "the Main Nerd" [end of file] -- dgannon@techbook.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-0636 (1200/2400, N81) From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail Sun Sep 5 04:42:41 PDT 1993 Article: 26903 of alt.activism Xref: oneb soc.history:15623 alt.censorship:12652 alt.activism:26903 alt.revisionism:3570 alt.discrimination:8509 alt.conspiracy:19102 talk.politics.misc:92099 talk.politics.mideast:33407 Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail From: dgannon@techbook.techbook.com (Dan Gannon) Newsgroups: soc.history,alt.censorship,alt.activism,alt.revisionism,alt.discrimination,alt.conspiracy,soc.ethics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast Subject: THE U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: A CHALLENGE Date: 4 Sep 1993 21:07:46 -0700 Organization: TECHbooks - Public Access Lines: 418 Message-ID: <26bomi$sup@techbook.techbook.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: techbook.techbook.com >From _The Journal of Historical Review_, Vol. 13, Number 4 (July/Aug. 1993): A Red-Letter Day for Revisionism, April 22, 1993 THE US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: A CHALLENGE Robert Faurisson The question of the existence or non-existence of the Nazi gas chambers is one of considerable historical importance. If the gas chambers existed, they provide evidence that the Germans attempted to physically exterminate the Jews; on the other hand, if they didn't exist, we have no evidence of such an extermination attempt. Pierre Vidal-Naquet, a leading French anti-Revisionist, is under no illusion. To those tempted to give up the controversy over the gas chambers, he has warned that to jettison the gas chambers "is to surrender in open country." (_Nouvel Observateur_, Sept. 21, 1984, p. 80.) One can only agree. The gas chambers are not - contrary to what Jean-Marie Le Pen once remarked - a mere footnote ("Point de detail") of Second World War history. Thus, those who contest their existence are subject to judicial sanction in France and some other countries. Nor could the monumental US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, DC, which was formally dedicated on April 22, 1993, allow itself to ignore the Nazi gas chambers. The question remained: What kind of physical representation of this terrifying weapon would the new Museum provide? We now know the answer, and it is dismaying: For lack of anything better this opulent museum - which has cost American taxpayers and donors from the American Jewish community more than $150 million - has been reduced to showing us, as its only model of a homicidal gas chamber, a casting of a gas chamber at the former Majdanek camp in Poland: a gas chamber for ... delousing. As I shall explain, even Jean-Claude Pressac, author of a 564-page work published in 1989 in cooperation with the Beate Klarsfeld Foundation of New York, was obliged to acknowledge that this room was merely a delousing chamber. This is nothing new. As early as 1945 the Americans were portraying four delousing (disinfestation) chambers in the Dachau camp (Germany) as homicidal gas chambers. ___________________________________________________________________________ Robert Faurisson is acknowledged as Europe's leading Holocaust Revisionist. He was educated at the Paris Sorbonne, and served as associate professor at the University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. Dr. Faurisson has addressed several IHR conferences, and many of his numerous essays and reviews on the Holocaust issue have appeared in translation in the _Journal_. This essay was translated by IHR editor Theodore J. O'Keefe. ___________________________________________________________________________ Those in charge of the new Holocaust Museum in Washington have resorted to so grave an imposture, I believe, because they are forced to do so: they are not able to offer visitors a physical representation, in any form whatsoever, of one of the chambers, we are told incessantly, the Germans used to murder swarms of victims. My Challenge in Stockholm and Washington On March 17, 1992, I threw down the gauntlet to the Jewish organizations of the entire world. On that day, after arriving in Stockholm at the invitation of my friend Ahmed Rami, I issued a challenge of international scope to the Swedish media. It consisted of this nine-word sentence: "Show me or draw me a Nazi gas chamber!" These words were accompanied by two pages of explanation. According to my information, the Swedish media, eager to answer my challenge, immediately contacted every possible source in order to obtain photographs of Nazi gas chambers. To their consternation, they discovered that no such photographs exist, and that the facilities or rooms currently portrayed to tourists at Auschwitz and elsewhere as homicidal gas chambers have none of the characteristics of such chemical slaughterhouses. Although the Swedish media leveled innumerable personal attacks against me, my challenge was not mentioned in a single newspaper article, or in a single word on radio or television. Over the months the embarrassment would grow among those who propagate the thesis of the physical extermination of the Jews during the Second World War: hence the frenzied agitation that has gripped Jewish organizations worldwide. On April 21, 1993, I renewed my challenge in Washington, this time directing it to the officials of the Holocaust Museum that was to be dedicated there the next day, with President Clinton, several heads of state, and Elie Wiesel in attendance. Among the Museum officials I had in mind, I was thinking especially of Michael Berenbaum, its Research Institute Director. My challenge in Washington can be summed up as follows: Tomorrow the US Holocaust Memorial Museum will be dedicated in Washington. I challenge the Museum authorities to provide us a physical representation of the magical gas chamber. I have searched for 30 years for such a representation without finding it: neither at Auschwitz, nor in any other concentration camp; not in a museum, or a book; neither in a dictionary nor an encyclopedia; not in a photograph, model or documentary film. Of course I am acquainted with certain attempts at representation, but all of them are illusory. None withstands examination. In particular, when one understands the extreme dangers of using Zyklon B (a commercial insecticide) or hydrocyanic acid (HCN), one quickly realizes that the sites sometimes portrayed to tourists as homicidal gas chambers could never have served as chemical slaughterhouses without enormous danger for everyone in the area. When one understands the extreme - and inevitable - complexity of a gas chamber for the execution of a single man by hydrocyanic acid in an American penitentiary, one sees immediately that the places portrayed as Nazi "gas chambers" - where, day after day, veritable swarms of victims were supposedly killed - lack today (and lacked then) the least bit of the formidable machinery that would have been required. Apart from the matter of sealing the chambers, one of the most serious problems to solve would have been that of the entering the HCN-saturated chamber after the execution to remove the corpses, themselves saturated with the same poison. Hydrocyanic acid penetrates into the skin, the mucous membranes, and the bodily fluids. The corpse of a man who has just been killed by this powerful poison is itself a dangerous source of poisoning, and cannot be touched with bare hands. In order to enter the HCN-saturated chamber to remove the corpse, special gear is needed, as well as a gas mask with a special filter. Because physical exertion must be kept to a minimum (it accelerates respiration, reducing the filter's effectiveness), it is necessary, before entering the area, to evacuate the gas, and then neutralize it. On this matter, I refer to the documents on gas chambers used in American penitentiaries that I published in 1980.^1 I warn the officials of the US Holocaust Museum and, in particular, Mr. Berenbaum, that tomorrow, April 22, 1993, they need not offer, as proof of the existence of Nazi gas chambers, a disinfection gas chamber, a shower room, a morgue, or an air-raid shelter. I am even less interested in a section of a wall, a door, a pile of shoes, a bundle of hair, or a heap of eyeglasses. I want a portrayal of an entire Nazi gas chamber, one that gives a precise idea of its technique and operation. Evasion and Trickery I knew this challenge could not be answered because, as a matter of fact, for half a century they have been telling us about Nazi gas chambers without ever showing us one. I also fully expected that the Museum would be reduced to playing a trick of some kind. But just what kind of trick? The answer would come the next day, April 22, the date of the formal dedication. (The Museum opened to the public on April 26.) On the 22nd, I obtained a copy of a book of about 250 pages that presents itself as a sort of catalog of the new Museum. This book is by Michael Berenbaum, and is entitled _The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust As Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum_ (1993, xvi + 240 pages). On page 138 are three photographs: - The first shows a Zyklon B canister and some pellets of Zyklon B, which is described as a "highly poisonous insecticide." - The second shows "a casting of the door to the gas chamber at Majdanek ... from the outside, SS guards could observe the killing through a small peephole." - The third photograph shows "the inside of a Majdanek gas chamber. The blue stain is a chemical remnant of Zyklon B."^2 The first photograph proves nothing more than that the Germans used the insecticide Zyklon B. (This commercial product was used throughout the world.) The second and the third photos should be familiar to visitors of the former Majdanek camp in Poland. They will recognize the outer door and the interior door, as well as a portion of the inside of the first chamber shown to visitors there as an execution gas chamber, even though this room has all the characteristics of a delousing gas chamber. In this regard, I will not cite here my own research, including my photographs that show the entire room, including the little annex containing a stove to provide the heat, which was essential to circulate the HCN from Zyklon B. (In the second photograph described above, the intake vent for the air heated by the furnace can be seen, at hip height, on the right.) Nor shall I cite here the expert report of American gas chamber specialist Fred Leuchter, which concludes definitively that this room was a delousing gas chamber where, not human beings but, at most, typhus-bearing lice were killed. [Photograph captioned, "Dr. Robert Faurisson at the April 21 IHR meeting in suburban Washington, DC, where he issued his challenge to the officials of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum."] J.-C. Pressac's Admission I shall content myself here by referring to Jean-Claude Pressac, protege of the Beate Klarsfeld Foundation and author of the 1989 anti-Revisionist work _Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers_ (a misleading title, by the way). Here, then, is Pressac's opinion of the room that Berenbaum dares to portray as a homicidal gas chamber: The red-ochre bricks stained with dark blue were for him [Bernard Jouanneau, an attorney who opposed Faurisson in a 1982 court case in Paris] material and visible proof of the existence of homicidal gas chambers. The problem, for there is one, is that the gas chamber presented has all the characteristics of a DELOUSING [sic] installation. I am not saying that it was never used to kill people, for that is possible [here, Pressac is wrong. - R.F.^3] but the traces of Prussian blue are an absolutely certain indication of use for delousing purposes. (p. 555.) Pressac goes on to note that the presence of a peep-hole is no proof of a homicidal gas chamber because a delousing gas chamber may be furnished with such a peep-hole. He concludes: I am sorry to say, and I am not the only one in the West, that the Majdanek homicidal and/or delousing gas chambers are still waiting for a true historian, which is mildly upsetting in view of the fact that the camp fell into the hands of the Russians intact in 1944 (p. 555.) On page 557 he presents a photograph of the exterior of the gas chamber in question and of another gas chamber located in the same building. According to the caption, this is a photograph ... showing one of the disinfestation gas chambers thought to be a homicidal gas chamber. Between the two doors with their inspection peepholes, the darker bricks are of Prussian blue colour, a sign of prolonged use of "Blausaure/blue acid," in other words hydrocyanic or prussic acid sold as a delousing agent under the name of "Zyklon B." It should be noted that these gas chambers were in the _Bad und Desinfektion_ ("Bath and Disinfection") building, located right at the entrance to the camp, and in plain view. It is understandable that in his "Bibliographical Note" (pp. 224-232) Berenbaum makes no mention of Pressac's 564-page book. A New Advance for Revisionism In 1978 President Jimmy Carter established a commission charged with creating a federal government Holocaust memorial museum. He chose as its chairman Elie Wiesel, thereby providing Arthur Butz with the inspiration for a comment both accurate and sarcastic: A historian was needed, but a histrion was chosen. The choice of Berenbaum as the Museum scholarly" authority is of the same nature. Berenbaum is an adjunct professor of theology at Georgetown University. Where a historian was required, a theologian was chosen - which is appropriate because, for some years now, in place of the history of the "Holocaust," Jewish organizations have substituted the RELIGION of the "Holocaust." The central pillar of this religion, as I have often said, is "the magical gas chamber that, like a mirage, is the image of nothing real." To portray this "central pillar," Museum officials selected a delousing gas chamber falsely labeled as a homicidal gas chamber. Although it was designed and built by the Germans as a facility for protecting the health of Jewish and non-Jewish prisoners, it is presented to us as an instrument for the torture and murder of these inmates. This portrayal epitomizes the deceit and the effrontery of the zealots of the "Holocaust" religion. The time has come for a little more intellectual honesty and sanity regarding the story of the Jewish people's real misfortunes during the Second World War. Visitors to the new Holocaust Museum in Washington - particularly American taxpayers, without whom it would not exist - have a right to demand an accounting from Mr. Berenbaum and his friends. A recent article in the _Los Angeles Times_ was headlined "Poll Finds 1 Out of 3 Americans Open to Doubt There Was a Holocaust." (April 20, 1993) The doubts will increase. A few days after the Museum's formal dedication, Berenbaum revealed to a newspaper: You're surrounded by death [in the Museum]. It's like working in an emergency room or a mortuary.... I've ended up on an analyst's couch. (_The Washington Post_, April 26, 1993, p. B6.) It is not out of the question that Berenbaum will retum to the analyst's couch when he grasps the grave consequences of his deception. April, 22, 1993, was supposed to be a date for the consecration of the "Holocaust" religion on American soil. In reality, this date will go down in history as marking an outstanding victory for revisionist historians. [Photograph captioned, "A few of the two hundred or so persons who rallied in Washington, DC, on April 22 to express opposition to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum."] To conclude, I would like to pay tribute here to those revisionists who have contributed to the victory on this specific point: - First, to Ahmed Rami, exiled in Stockholm, who allowed me to publicly launch the "Stockholm Challenge" of March 17, 1992; - Next, to the Institute for Historical Review in southern California, which, since 1979, has, more than any institution in the world, made possible the publication of books, essays and articles on the "Holocaust" of a scholarly and often unrewarding nature, and this in spite of repression, persecution and violence; this Institute has organized eleven conferences under sometimes difficult and even dramatic conditions, and, as a matter of fact, arranged the meeting in suburban Washington, DC, on April 21 where I was able to renew my Stockholm Challenge, this time to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum;^4 - Finally, to Ernst Zundel of Toronto, without whom "Holocaust" revisionism would probably still be struggling in obscurity. My thoughts are also of the French revisionists who have expended so much effort, among them one person in particular, whom I cannot mention without putting in danger, who could be called the mainspring of the revisionist movement in France. Notes 1. Serge Thion, _Verite historique ou verite politique?_ (Paris: 1980), pp. 301-309. 2. On pages 140-144 of Berenbaum's new book, one finds naive plaster figurines that supposedly represent, in sequence, victims in the changing room, in the gas chamber, and in the crematory room of an Auschwitz-Birkenau crematory. While historical museums (such as military and war museums) routinely strive to illustrate what really happened using models that are as accurate and as graphic as possible, these figurines in Berenbaum's book are presented in a kind of ethereal setting. The captions are sullied by imprecision, errors, and absurdities, and they testify to an urgent need to revise downward the number of alleged victims of each gassing, and the number of daily cremations. Berenbaum makes discreet allusion to a model that the Polish Communists built after the war, and which is still exhibited at the Auschwitz State Museum (Block 4, second floor). I understand that a replica of this model may be displayed at the Holocaust Museum in Washington. If so, why hasn't Berenbaum included it in his book? Might he have learned that I often use this model to illustrate the physical impossibilities of the gassing operations it is supposed to replicate? See, in particular, my video "Le Probleme des chambres a gaz" (1982), as well as my commentary, "Auschwitz en images," given at the end of the French edition of Wilhelm Staglich's book, _Le Mythe d'Auschwitz_ (La Vieille Taupe, 1986, pp. 492, 507). Even J.-C. Pressac is skeptical of this model. (_Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers_, pp. 377-378). Symptomatically, though, he does not provide one of his own. 3. A Zyklon B delousing gas chamber could not have been used as a homicidal gas chamber. The first can be operated relatively easily, while the second is necessarily very complicated. The conceptual difference between the two lies in the relative ease of ridding the fabric and clothes of HCN gas after the delousing, as opposed to the extreme difficulty of removing gas from the skin, mucous membranes, and bodily fluids of a corpse. In the first case, the HCN gas is removed by blowing in a large amount of hot air, which causes most of it to evaporate. Then the fabric and the clothes are beaten for some time outdoors to discharge the remaining gas. In the second case, heating or beating the corpses would not be possible. An authentic homicidal gas chamber, of the kind used in the United States to execute convicted criminals, is extremely complicated. To execute even a SINGLE PERSON is so complicated that one can scarcely imagine the appalling sophistication the Nazi gas chambers would have required to execute not just one victim, but hundreds or even thousands at a time. Such gas chambers would have become veritable baths of poison, impossible to drain. Nobody, even wearing a gas mask, could have ever survived entering such oceans of hydrocyanic acid and making the physical effort of removing the corpses, and clean up for the next batch. 4. At that meeting, I also made two additional challenges: First: give me the name of the person whom you consider to be the best eyewitness of gassings. Second: make public the documents you continue to keep secret, particularly the papers of Dr. Mengele. (There are about 30 pounds of Mengele papers, including his memoir _Fiat Lux_ - "Let There Be Light" - which suggests that he describes there the reality of Auschwitz.) [end of article] [Reprinted by permission from _The Journal of Historical Review_, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA. Subscription rate: $40 per year, domestic. $50 per year, foreign.] This article was scanned by the System Operator of the "Banished CPU" computer bulletin board system, which is located in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Banished CPU supports Freedom of Speech! ___________________________________________________________ | | | For 300-9600 bps (3 lines w/V.32) call: (503) 232-5783 | | For 14400 bps (2 lines w/V.32bis) call: (503) 232-6566 | |___________________________________________________________| Sysop: Maynard "the Main Nerd" [end of file] -Dan Gannon -- dgannon@techbook.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-0636 (1200/2400, N81) From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail Wed Sep 8 07:58:45 PDT 1993 >From _The Journal of Historical Review_, Vol. 13, Number 4 (July/Aug. 1993): Organization of American Historians Censors the IHR On October 31, 1992, the Executive Board of the Organization of American Historians (OAH) formally condemned the Institute for Historical Review and resolved to exclude "advertisements or announcements" from the IHR in the _OAH Newsletter_. For some years now, the Institute has been a member of the OAH, the leading organization of scholars devoted to American history. In 1991, the IHR submitted a short notice for publication in the "calls for papers" section of the _OAH Newsletter_. Appearing in the November 1991 issue, the notice informed readers that the IHR's _Journal of Historical Review_ welcomed contributions on topics such as FDR's campaign to get the US into war, and the background to the Pearl Harbor attack. This small notice upset some _OAH Newsletter_ readers, and touched off a debate among historians around the country. Letters protesting the notice appeared in the May 1992 _OAH Newsletter_, including a particularly vicious one by Jordan Schwarz, who asserted that the IHR is a "Nazi" or "pro-Nazi" organization with a "mission of hate." A letter by _Journal_ editor Mark Weber responding to these false allegations was rejected. Not a single word in defense of the IHR and its work been has so far been permitted to appear in the pages of the _OAH Newsletter_. Then, on October 31, the OAH Executive Board resolved to prohibit any future notice or advertisement by the IHR. A minority of Board members argued against the decision, saying that it violated the OAH's stated support for the principle of freedom of speech and inquiry. The Board has five officers, including President Lawrence W. Levine of the University of California, Berkeley. A formal statement of the OAH Board's October decision appeared in the February 1993 _OAH Newsletter_. In the same issue also appeared a full-page article, "Revisionism and the Holocaust," which reported on a heated panel discussion at a Holocaust conference in April 1992 at Millersville University (Pennsylvania). David Oshinsky of Rutgers University, one of the principal speakers at the meeting of about 150 persons, argued that advertisements and notices by associations such as the IHR and the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH) should be rejected out of hand by academic and student publications. Revisionist statements are "irresponsible" and "intentionally hurtful and fallacious" in content, he said. By providing a forum for a "cadre of distortionists ... you open up the path to a kind of legitimacy." The panel's other main speaker, Samuel Walker of the University of Nebraska-Omaha, disagreed, saying that the principle of free speech should be upheld even in this case. Throughout this _OAH Newsletter_ article, revisionist views were repeatedly and simplistically referred to as "denying the Holocaust." In a letter dated February 24, the IHR responded to the OAH Board's October decision. Not until May 7, however, was the IHR informed that "the OAH has decided not publish" the letter. The full text of the IHR's February 24 letter follows: _OAH Newsletter_ Organization of American Historians 112 North Bryan Street Bloomington, IN 47408 The October 31 decision by the OAH Executive Board to exclude "advertisements or announcements" from the Institute for Historical Review is "political correctness" at its hypocritical worst. According to the Board's formal statement (published in the February _OAH Newsletter_), the ostensible basis for this decision is that an advertisement or notice from the IHR would not be "consonant with the purposes of the Organization." However, no explanation is given of precisely how an IHR advertisement is not "consonant" with the OAH's purposes. That *any* IHR advertisement or notice is prohibited *beforehand* - regardless of content - is particularly disturbing. This decision presumably forbids an IHR advertisement for our edition of Arthur Ponsonby's classic study of First World War propaganda, _Falsehood in Wartime_, or for our edition of collected writings by the eminent American historian and sociologist Harry Elmer Barnes, or even for one of the many books we distribute that are published by prominent "mainstream" publishers. It is ironic indeed that an advertisement by International Publishers appears in the very issue of the _OAH Newsletter_ that informs readers of the decision to forbid any advertisement from the IHR. Operating for years as the publishing arm of the Communist Party USA, this Marxist-Leninist enterprise has offered, among other writings, works by Stalin and Mao Zedong. Presumably this _OAH Newsletter_ ad offering the _Collected Works_ of Marx and Engels, along with other "Marxist Classics," is "consonant with the purposes" of the OAH. Perhaps the most remarkable sentence of the OAH statement is this: "We [members of the OAH Executive Board] all abhor, on both moral and scholarly grounds, the substantive arguments of the Institute for Historical Review." Since when has the OAH been pronouncing on the *moral* validity of *arguments*? Is this a unique pronouncement, or - to be fair and consistent - can we look forward to similar OAH declarations on the *moral* fitness of arguments by other organizations, publishers or even individual scholars? And precisely what is the Board's "moral" yardstick? Nowhere is it given. As for "scholarly grounds": anyone who rejects arguments on this basis should be willing and able to support his/her view with logic and evidence. Precisely which of the IHR's "substantive arguments" did the OAH Executive Board find so abhorrent? All of them? Some of them? Not a single one is specifically mentioned. How about the IHR's often-repeated "arguments" in favor of international peace and understanding? Or the IHR's staunch support for freedom of speech and expression? "We all reject their claims to be taken seriously as historians," the OAH Executive Board statement goes on. Just who are "they"? Did the OAH Executive Board evaluate each and every _Journal_ contributor or IHR Editorial Advisory Committee member to determine if he or she is a "serious" historian? And on what basis? By any reasonable standard, at least some IHR _Journal_ contributors and IHR Committee members are serious and qualified historians. As for myself, I hold a Master's degree in European history from Indiana University (Bloomington) [where the OAH offices are located]. On March 22, 1988, Toronto District Court Judge Ron Thomas ruled on my qualifications as a historian. After carefully considering arguments for and against recognizing me as a credible historian, he decided to permit me to testify (for five days, as it turned out) as a qualified specialist of wartime Germany's "final solution" policy and the Holocaust issue. While OAH Executive Board members take care to explicitly affirm "the importance of defending free speech," they have flunked a practical test of their support for this principle. We urge the OAH Executive Board to courageously re-consider a decision that, I am convinced, will one day be regarded with shame and embarrassment. Sincerely, Mark Weber Editor, _The Journal of Historical Review_ Institute for Historical Review Newport Beach, Calif. [end of article] [Reprinted by permission from _The Journal of Historical Review_, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA. Subscription rate: $40 per year, domestic. $50 per year, foreign.] ________________________________________________________________________ _The Journal of Historical Review_ Editor: MARK WEBER _The Journal of Historical Review_ Associate Editor: GREG RAVEN _The Journal of Historical Review_ EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GEORGE ASHLEY, Ph.D. Los Angeles Unified School District (Ret.) ENRIQUE AYNAT, LL.B. Torreblanca, Spain PHILIP BARKER, Ph.D. Minneapolis, Minnesota JOHN BENNETT, LL.B. Australian Civil Liberties Union Melbourne, Australia FRIEDRICH P. BERG, B.Sc. Ft. Lee, New Jersey ALEXANDER V. BERKIS, LL.M., Ph.D. Longwood College (Ret.) W. BEVERAGGI-ALLENDE, Ph.D. University of Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina ARTHUR R. BUTZ, Ph.D. Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois BOYD CATHEY, Ph.D. _The Southern Partisan_ ROBERT H. COUNTESS, Ph.D. Huntsville, Alabama ALBERT J. ECKSTEIN, Ph.D. Private Research Consultant ROBERT FAURISSON, Ph.D. University of Lyon-2 Lyon, France GEORGE FRANZ-WILLING, Ph.D. Uberlingen, Germany VERNE E. FUERST, Ph.D. Hartford, Connecticut SAMUEL EDWARD KONKIN III Long Beach, California R. CLARENCE LANG, Ph.D., B.D. Seguin, Texas MARTIN A. LARSON, Ph.D. Phoenix, Arizona JAMES MARTIN, Ph.D. Colorado Springs, Colorado CARLO MATTOGNO Italy HIDEO MIKI Professor of History (Ret.) National Defense Academy Yokosuka, Japan REVILO P. OLIVER, Ph.D. University of Illinois (Ret.) Urbana, Illinois HENRI ROQUES, Ph.D. Colombes, France WILHELM STAGLICH, Dr. Jur. Badenweiler, Germany UDO WALENDY, Diplo. Pol. Vlotho/Weser, Germany ANDREAS R. WESSERLE, Ph.D. Marquette University (Ret.) Milwaukee, Wisconsin ________________________________________________________________________ This article was scanned by the System Operator of the "Banished CPU" computer bulletin board system, which is located in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Banished CPU supports Freedom of Speech! ___________________________________________________________ | | | For 300-9600 bps (3 lines w/V.32) call: (503) 232-5783 | | For 14400 bps (2 lines w/V.32bis) call: (503) 232-6566 | |___________________________________________________________| Sysop: Maynard "the Main Nerd" [end of file] -Dan Gannon -- dgannon@techbook.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-0636 (1200/2400, N81) From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail Wed Sep 8 08:03:57 PDT 1993 >From _The Journal of Historical Review_, Vol. 13, Number 4 (July/Aug. 1993): The Organization of American Historians: Faithfully Reflecting Academic Standards MARK WEBER As one might expect, the recent annual conference of the Organization of American Historians - the foremost association of scholars devoted to US history - and the OAH's scholarly _Journal of American History_, faithfully reflect the prevailing standards and ideological slant of America's historical "establishment." At the 1993 OAH Annual Meeting, held April 15-18 in Anaheim, California, the specialized sessions devoted to particular historical issues included the following: - "Links in the Chain: Musical Culture of the Labor and Black Freedom Movements" - "Urban Black Communities in the Twentieth Century: Race, Class and Economic Change" - "The African-American Context for Cowboy and Western Music" - "Woman's Work and Gender Identity" - "Woman's Culture and Women's Biography" - "Malcolm X and Historical Memory" - "Race, Ethnicity, and Public Policy in Modern America" - "Recent Research in Slave Women's History" - "Recruiting Minorities into the Historical Profession" - "The Development of a Chinese American Consciousness" - "African American Intellectuals and the Discourse of American Culture" - "The Legacies of W.E.B. Du Bois" - "The Problem of American Conservatism" - "Religion and Identity in the Old South: Gender and Race" - "Race, Class and the Law in the South" - "Race, Labor and 'Social Equality' in the Jim Crow South" - "Race, Gender and Violence: The Case of _Celia, A Slave_" - "Work-in-Progress Roundtable on Gay and Lesbian history" - "Work-in-Progress Roundtable on American Indian History" - "African-Americans and Public Rituals in New York City" - "On Common Ground: The Historical Archaeology of African America" - "Ethnicity and Class in Los Angeles" - "Los Angeles One Year Later: Race and Politics in L.A" - "The Culture of Violence in the American Revolution" - "Celebration: Songs of American Diversity" - "Twenty-Five Years After King's Assassination: Perspectives on Black Movement Leadership" On Friday evening, the 16th, OAH President Lawrence W. Levine, a specialist of African-American history at the University of California, Berkeley, delivered a rousing Presidential Address to the conference attendees. In this keynote speech (which I attended), Levine mockingly rejected what he called the "Eurocentric" interpretation of history, and staunchly defended the current trend toward an ever more "inclusive" treatment of the past. He dismissed as wrong-headed and prejudiced the critics of this trend, specifically mentioning by name the warnings of previous OAH presidents C. Vann Woodward and Eugene Genovese. While most historians present expressed their approval of Levine's message with an enthusiastic standing ovation, not everyone was thrilled. The next day, during a symposium on "Writing Contemporary Presidential Biography" (which I also attended), Stephen Ambrose of the University of New Orleans joked that this is one of the few sessions at this year's OAH conference not devoted to class, gender, race or ethnicity. Contrary to what seems to be the currently prevailing wisdom, he went on, it still worthwhile and appropriate to deal with history made by "dead white males" - including former American presidents. Ambrose also noted with regret that although this OAH conference is taking place on the 250th anniversary of the birth of Thomas Jefferson, not a single session is devoted to him or his legacy. But perhaps that is just as well, Ambrose went on, because more attention would likely be devoted to Sally Hemmings than to the Declaration of Independence. The historian also noted that not a single session at this year's conference dealt with the world-historical events of 50 years ago, including, for example, the first meeting at Teheran of Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin. Like the OAH Annual Meeting, _The Journal of American History_, the OAH's quarterly scholarly periodical, similarly reflects the prevailing outlook and standards of historians of United States history. [Photograph captioned, "Lawrence Levine, President of the Organization of American Historians, 1992-1993, and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley."] On the front cover of the March 1993 issue (which is more than 500-pages thick), is a photograph of "Chicano students protesting during the March 1968 high school walkouts in East Los Angeles." The photo highlights a lengthy feature article inside by Edward Escobar, "The Dialectics of Repression: The Los Angeles Police Department and the Chicano Movement, 1968-1971." Accompanying this polemical piece are five photographs that show demonstrating Mexican-Americans, and alleged police repression against Chicanos. ". . . Thus, while the LAPD [Los Angeles Police Department] may have curbed militant Chicano activism," Escobar happily concludes his essay, "the response to the department's tactics gave rise to a new consciousness that has the potential to empower the Chicano community." In this same issue of the OAH _Journal_ is a laudatory review of Herbert Aptheker's _Anti-Racism in U.S. History_. For many years Aptheker was the chief theoretician of the Communist Party, USA, and this new book continues to faithfully reflect his Marxist-Leninist interpretation of history. In the opinion of reviewer Herbert Shapiro of the University of Cincinnati, Aptheker's book ... breaks fresh ground in comprehensively and systematically exploring a theme that has hitherto been ignored or received fragmentary attention. It is certainly to be hoped that Aptheker's work stimulates others to further consideration of this vital aspect of the struggle for democracy in American history. Finally, this same issue of _The Journal of American History_ includes a laudatory review of a COMIC BOOK. While such a work would normally not merit attention in this quarterly, this is no ordinary cartoonist's work. It's _Maus: A Survivor's Tale_, Parts I and II, a Holocaust "oral history account" by Art Spiegelman that has received gushing praise from countless American newspapers and magazines. In his _Journal of American History_ review, Joshua Brown of Hunter College (CUNY), writes: "_Maus_ is a significant contribution to the field of history, not in spite of the medium chosen by its author, but because of it." In Brown's opinion, cartoonist Spiegelman's depiction of Jews as mice, Germans as cats, and Poles as pigs "subvert the stereotypes of racism constructed by the Nazis"! Besides its implicitly contemptuous portrayal of non-Jewish humanity, this utterly subjective and impressionistic work is littered with historical falsehood and distortion. For example, a _Maus_ character arriving at Auschwitz solemnly informs the reader: And we came here to the concentration camp Auschwitz, And we knew that from here we will not come out anymore. We knew the stories - that they will gas us and throw us in the ovens. This was 1944.... We knew everything. And here we were.... So it was. Among the numerous Jews who did, in fact, "come out" of Auschwitz were - to name just a prominent few - Elie Wiesel (and his father), Anne Frank (who died of typhus later in the Bergen-Belsen camp), and Otto Frank (her father). Moreover, _Maus_, Part I, begins with a quotation attributed to Hitler: "The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but they are not human." The quote is, in fact, spurious. But hey, who's checking? Certainly not the reviewer or OAH _Journal_ editors. As this review shows (once again), the normal standards of historical evidence and criticism are simply tossed aside when it comes to the secular pseudo-religion of our era. In light of such "scholarship," any OAH criticism of the IHR is not only ludicrous, but serves to underscore a clear double standard. In the field of history - no less than with clothing styles and musical tastes - the more fashionable anything is, the more quickly it is destined to become unfashionable. Ten years from now - if not sooner - historians will look back on the OAH of 1993 with a mixture of amusement, irritation and disgust. [end of article] [Reprinted by permission from _The Journal of Historical Review_, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA. Subscription rate: $40 per year, domestic. $50 per year, foreign.] This article was scanned by the System Operator of the "Banished CPU" computer bulletin board system, which is located in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Banished CPU supports Freedom of Speech! ___________________________________________________________ | | | For 300-9600 bps (3 lines w/V.32) call: (503) 232-5783 | | For 14400 bps (2 lines w/V.32bis) call: (503) 232-6566 | |___________________________________________________________| Sysop: Maynard "the Main Nerd" [end of file] -Dan Gannon -- dgannon@techbook.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-0636 (1200/2400, N81) From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail Mon Sep 13 07:26:17 PDT 1993 Article: 3670 of alt.revisionism Xref: oneb soc.history:16068 alt.censorship:12786 alt.activism:27219 alt.revisionism:3670 alt.discrimination:8768 alt.conspiracy:19437 alt.politics.correct:5125 alt.journalism.criticism:508 talk.politics.misc:93027 talk.politics.mideast:33925 Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail From: dgannon@techbook.techbook.com (Dan Gannon) Newsgroups: soc.history,alt.censorship,alt.activism,alt.revisionism,alt.discrimination,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.correct,alt.journalism.criticism,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast Subject: Croatia's Leader Denounced as Holocaust Revisionist Date: 13 Sep 1993 00:20:44 -0700 Organization: TECHbooks - Public Access Lines: 184 Message-ID: <27170c$ajs@techbook.techbook.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: techbook.techbook.com >From _The Journal of Historical Review_, Vol. 13, Number 4 (July/Aug. 1993): President Tudjman Refuses to Recant CROATIA'S LEADER DENOUNCED AS HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST In spite of strong criticism from prominent American Jewish leaders, the President of Croatia refuses to repudiate his revisionist views on the Holocaust issue. Franjo Tudjman, Croatia's democratically elected leader, and a respected European scholar, has aroused controversy for publicly rejecting the "Six Million" story. At the invitation of the US government, Tudjman and other foreign leaders attended the formal ceremony on April 22 in Washington, DC, dedicating the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. Elie Wiesel, a Jewish survivor of Auschwitz and other German wartime camps, was not happy. "Tudjman's presence in the midst of survivors is a disgrace," said Wiesel, who also expressed concern that a 1988 book by the Croatian historian would, in the words of the New York Times (April 22), "fuel the arguments of historical revisionists who deny that the Holocaust occurred." Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, said that the only justification for Tudjman's appearance at the dedication ceremony would be to provide an opportunity for him to publicly repudiate his heretical views. "If that is not the case," Hier said, "the invitation is giving credence to one of the world's most famous Holocaust revisionists." (New York Times, April 22, 1993.) "Exaggerated Data" Tudjman readily acknowledges that Europe's Jews suffered "terrible hardships" during the war years. At the same time, though, he has written in Bespuca - Povijesne Zbiljnosti ("Wastelands: Historical Truth"), a 500-page scholarly work first published in 1988: The estimated loss of up to six million [Jewish] dead is founded too much on both emotional, biased testimonies and on exaggerated data in the postwar reckonings of war crimes and on the squaring of accounts with the defeated.... In the mid-1980s, world Jewry still has the need to recall its "holocaust" even by trying to prevent the election of the former U.N. Secretary General Kurt Waldheim as president of Austria. Tudjman reportedly estimates that a total of 900,000 Jews perished in the catastrophe of the Second World War. (New York Times, April 22.) He also suggests that many wartime Jewish deaths would not have occurred if German armed forces had prevailed over the Soviet Union, allowing for a "territorial solution" to the Jewish question such as a "reservation" in Eastern Poland or in Madagascar. (See The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1992, pp. 240-243, and The New Republic, Nov. 25, 1991, pp. 16, 18.) Tudjman reaffirmed his revisionist outlook in an interview with Canadian television: "With regard to Jews, I'm inclined to agree with those scholars in the world who say that the figure of six million is exaggerated." (The New Republic, Jan. 20, 1992, p. 5.) Respected Historian Tudjman's views are all the more noteworthy because they are those of a respected historian who cannot seriously be regarded as a "Nazi." During the Second World War he fought against Croatia's pro-German Ustashe regime as an officer in the partisan forces of Communist leader Tito. After 1945, he served in Belgrade as a member of the General Staff of the Yugoslav National Army, eventually attaining the rank of Major General. In 1961 he left the military to pursue academic interests. [Photograph captioned, "Franjo Tudjman"] After study in Belgrade, he assumed a position in 1963 as a part-time professor on the Faculty of Political Science at the University of Zagreb, and in 1964 he earned a doctorate in history. From 1961 to 1967, he was director in Zagreb of the Institute for the History of the Workers Movement. He has also served as editor-in-chief of the magazine Paths of the Revolution, and as a member of the editorial boards of the military-theoretical journal Voino delo and the intellectual magazine Forum. Tudjman is the author of numerous historical works, several of which have appeared in other languages, and has been a guest lecturer at universities and institutes in Italy, Germany and the United States. In 1966 he was a a speaker at the International Seminar series at Harvard University. His book Nationalism in Contemporary Europe was published in 1981 by the Columbia University Press, and his controversial 1988 book Bespuca ("Wastelands") was given a respectful review by Germany's prestigious national daily, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Jan. 16, 1990. Tudjman, the paper told readers, has dealt with questions of contemporary history "with competence and courage." Tudjman's refusal to give in to demands that he repudiate his revisionist views on the Holocaust issue is entirely consistent with his record of defiance of biased "official" history. Because of his dissident views, Communist Yugoslav authorities ordered his arrest in 1972 and barred him from public activity for two years. After a second arrest in 1981 for dissident activities, he was imprisoned for a year and a half. Following the breakup of the artificial Yugoslav state, Tudjman emerged as leader of the Croatian Democratic Union, his country's major political party. After the victory of his party in the first democratic elections held in Croatia in more than 50 years, he was sworn in as president on May 30, 1990. A Little-Known Holocaust Few of those Americans who are so determined to "never forget" the wartime fate of Europe's Jews know much about what happened to the continent's other national and ethnic groups. For example, many tens of thousands of Croat, Slovene and Bosnian Muslim prisoners were summarily murdered at the end of the war by the partisan forces of Yugoslav Communist leader Tito (who was backed by the United States and Britain). In addition to combat personnel taken prisoner, the victims also included nurses, nuns and children. Most historians have estimated that the partisans shot from 70,000 to 100,000 people without trial within weeks of the war's end, although some believe that as many as 500,000 were summarily killed. Most of the victims were people who were trying to flee Tito's Communist forces. The refugees were returned by British troops from detention camps in Austria, or were turned back at the border by British forces who occupied southern Austria and northeastern Italy. At one site near Sosice in Slovenia, for example, as many as 40,000 were systematically shot, and their bodies flung into caves. (See: New York Times, July 9, 1990.; Los Angeles Times, Nov. 4, 1990.; The New Republic, Dec. 24, 1990, pp. 16-19.) Revisionism In Croatia Reflecting the historical revisionism that has been sweeping Eastern Europe and the lands of the former Soviet Union in recent years, a downtown street and an elementary school in Croatia's capital city of Zagreb have recently been renamed in honor of Mile Budak, a noted author of several novels written before the Second World War. Most of Zagreb University's main facilities are on the newly named street. The Simon Wiesenthal Center has protested the renaming because Budak was a ranking minister in the wartime Croatian republic (which was allied with Germany), and promulgated the law prohibiting Jewish participation in Croatian "institutions of social, sports and cultural life." While a few European countries have outlawed Holocaust Revisionism, in Croatia it enjoys support from the highest level. Indeed, Croatians are more free than Americans to express their views on this issue. - M. W. [end of article] [Reprinted by permission from _The Journal of Historical Review_, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA. Subscription rate: $40 per year, domestic. $50 per year, foreign.] This article was scanned by the System Operator of the "Banished CPU" computer bulletin board system, which is located in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Banished CPU supports Freedom of Speech! ___________________________________________________________ | | | For 300-9600 bps (3 lines w/V.32) call: (503) 232-5783 | | For 14400 bps (2 lines w/V.32bis) call: (503) 232-6566 | |___________________________________________________________| Sysop: Maynard "the Main Nerd" [end of file] -Dan Gannon -- dgannon@techbook.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-0636 (1200/2400, N81)
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.