From mcurtis@inetport.com Sat Dec 28 12:00:12 PST 1996 Article: 89569 of alt.revisionism From: mcurtis@inetport.com (Mike Curtis) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: 'Let them die, why should you care?' Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 16:10:06 GMT Reply-To: mcurtis@inetport.com Message-ID: <32c6966c.9125173@news.inetport.com> References:<59pj3l$cjv@juliana.sprynet.com> <32c079a4.29964937@news.gte.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99g/32.339 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.64.12.98 Lines: 70 Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!clicnet!news.clic.net!news.bconnex.net!feed1.news.erols.com!worldnet.att.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!206.64.12.3!news.inetport.com!206.64.12.98 10@11.12 (Matt Giwwer) wrote: >>## German civilians living near the camp, after the American troops >>## have taken them to Buchenwald to witness the horrors. Notice how >>## well-dressed and well-fed they are. >> >># The German civilians had nothing to do with the running of >># the camp. Why do you criticize them if they are nicly dressed? >> >>Try not to be so stupid. I am not criticizing them. I am pointing >>out that there was enough food for everybody, yet the inmates >>starved to death. > > Amazing really. POWs starved at Andersonville but their civilians >were well fed also. And no one claims (for at least the last 70 >years) that it was a death camp. > Well, if Giwer is going to continue to prove that he is constantly in error, I will help to continually prove it when he hits my era of true interest. _Andersonville_ by MacKinley Kantor, published in 1955. He makes this claim. Bruce Catton in his introduction to _John Ransom's Andersonville Diary_, Eriksson, Vermont, 1986, says: "To become a prisoner in the Civil War, on either side, was no shortcut to survival. Quite the opposite; and to understand how appallingly lethal were the prison camps, North and South, one need only to reflect on this bit of simple arithmetic: about two and one-half times as many soldiers were subjected to hunger, pestilence and soul-sickness of the prison camps as were exposed to the deadly fire and crossfire of the Guns of Gettysburg--and the camps killed nearly ten times as many as died on that battlefield. Best estimates that the Confederacy imprisoned, ovr-all, some 194,000 Union soldiers, of whom 36,400 died, and the Union held captive about 220,000 Confederates, of whom 30,150 died. If we are looking for culprits, there is not much room for choice between them. But we do better, I believe, to forget the villians, personal or collective. They obscure a bigger and more useful truth: the horrors endured by Ransome and his contemperary POW's were not created willfully and malevolently in order to kill them -- as many good people on both sides believed at the time -- but by a combination of human blundering in the face of vast, bewildering problems, and the climate of horror that make up war itself." [This intoduction was first published in 1958] How about a 1962 introduction to _Andersonville: A Story of Rebel Military Prisons_ by John McElroy, Fawcett Publications, 1962. The introduction is by Phillip Doran Stern. "Andersonville pales in comparison with the montrous death camps like Auschwitz, Belsen, Buchenwald, and Dachau, where the Nazis debased all humanity with their dreadful deeds, but a man could starve and die in Georgia just as surley in Germany. Unlike the Nazis, however, the confederates who ran andersonville were not deliberately trying to exterminate their captives. . . . ." I could find more recent discussions and writings, but I don't think it is worth the time. Mike Curtis E-mail mcurtis@inetport.com Nizkor Web: http://www.nizkor.org/
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.