Source: National Post, Tuesday, October 31, 2000 (A16) Genetics ------------ MALE GENE POOL BACKS THEORY ON OUR ORIGINS Branches Of Family Tree PARIS - The theory that Homo sapiens originated in Africa before slowly spreading across the world has been powerfully backed by new research into variations in the male sex chromosome. The so-called "Out of Africa" hypothesis, sketched in 1987, is based on mitochondrial DNA - scraps of genetic tissue only inherited from the maternal side -- that were found in ancient fossils. This suggested that modern man first appeared in eastern Africa about 150,000 years ago, leaving at various times between 35,000 and 89,000 years ago and eventually conquering the planet. A major research effort from scientists in eight countries, published yesterday in the November issue of the journal 'Nature Genetics', has now validated the theory -- and in so doing has devised a potent tool to probe the very earliest origins of mankind. The team drew up a genetic family tree of mankind thanks to small variations in the genes of 1,062 men in communities around the world. They identified 167 markers: genetic sequences called alleles in the Y chromosome, which only men carry. (Women carry two X chromosomes, while men have both X and Y.) Variations in these markers corresponded astonishingly to the regions where the men live. In other words, the markers reflected the waves of human migration that unfolded across the world over tens of thousands of years. Each ripple caused a tiny disturbance in the male gene pool as the species intermingled and the Y chromosome adapted through natural selection. Samples were taken from men in 22 different regions, in countries that included Pakistan and India, Cambodia and Laos, Australia and New Guinea, America, as well as Mali, Sudan, Ethiopia and Japan. Their allele mutations were then assembled into 10 types, called haplogroups. Like branches off a family tree, they show a migration from eastern Africa into the Middle East, then southern and southeast Asia, then New Guinea and Australia, followed by Europe and Central Asia. Among the findings: * Some modern-day men in later-day Sudan, Ethiopia and southern Africa are the closest lineal descendants to the first Homo sapiens who set out on that great trek. "A minority of contemporary East Africans and Khoisan [southern Africans such as the Bushmen and Hottentots] represent the descendants of the most ancestral patrilineages of anatomically modern humans that left Africa between 35,000 and 89,000 years ago," the team write [sic]; * New Guinesa and Australia were settled early in the process. This could be supported by the finding of a Homo sapiens burial site in Australia believed to [sic] 60,000 years old; * Japan has remained in remarkable genetic isolation. The mutations are strikingly different from those of surrounding populations and account by themselves for a specific haplogroup; * Native Americans have a common ancestry with Eurasians and East Asians, raising intriguing questions about the first peopling of North America. The findings "takes historical population genetics, or 'archeogenetics,' a quantum leap forward," says a commentary in 'Nature Genetics' by a team from the McDonald Institute for Archeological Research in Cambridge. The research was especially important given that it came from DNA of living populations rather than genetic material teased out of rare fossils, they said. The technique was to take samples of genetic tissues, amplify them and then search for the markers using a chromatographic analysis. The study was led by Peter Underhill of Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif. Agence France-Presse
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.