Deceit & Misrepresentation Schindler's List [Continued]
As if to reinforce his demonstration of ignorance of the very
material he purports to understand to the point where he is capable
of telling us what is "fact" and what is "physically impossible,"
Mr. Vicksell repeats his comment, in slightly different terms, the
following day. When he is asked how he knew that Goeth never shot
anyone from his front porch, he rose, a fish to bait:
Because wartime aerial photographs of the Plaskow camp show
clearly that the camp was over the crest of a hill from Goeth's
villa. As I've said before, he'd have needed a mortar or a
howitzer to knock off inmates in the concentration camp yard.
[5]
This time, we see
Mr. Vicksell reveal the source of his "facts,"
the selfsame John Ball pamphlet touted a month before by
Mr. Gannon, and distributed by
Ernst Zündel's publishing arm. Mr.
Ball's "wartime aerial photographs" provided
Mr. Vicksell with all
the proof he needed. Alas,
Mr. Vicksell would have been better served had he actually read the very book he so casually dismissed:
The first morning Commandant Goeth stepped out his front door
and murdered a prisoner at random, there was a tendency to see
this also, like the first execution on Chujowa Go'rka, as a
unique event, discrete from what would become the customary life
of the camp. In fact, of course, the killings on the hill would
soon prove to be habitual, and so would Amon's morning routine.
Wearing a shirt and riding breeches and boots on which his
orderly had put a high shine, he would emerge on the steps of
his temporary villa. (They were renovating a better place for
him down at the other end of the camp perimeter.) As the season
wore on he would appear without his shirt, for he loved the sun.
But for the moment he stood in the clothes in which he had eaten
breakfast, a pair of binoculars in one hand and a sniper's rifle
in the other.
He would scan the camp area, the work at the
quarry, the prisoners pushing or hauling the quarry trucks on
the rails which passed by his door. Those glancing up could see
the smoke from the cigarette which he held clamped between his
lips, the way a man smokes without hands when he is too busy to
put down the tools of his trade. Within the first few days of
the camp's life he appeared thus at his front door and shot a
prisoner who did not seem to be pushing hard enough at a cart
loaded with limestone.
No one knew Amon's precise reason for
settling on that prisoner - Amon certainly did not have to
document his motives. With one blast form the doorstep, the man
was plucked from the group of pushing and pulling captives and
hurled sideways in the road. The others stopped pushing, of
course, their muscles frozen in expectation of a general
slaughter. But Amon waved them on, frowning, as if to say that
he was pleased for the moment with the standard of work that he
was getting from them."
[6]
We find it amazing that Holocaust deniers can dig up aerial
photographs of the camp, with Goeth's house as it was in 1943, yet
completely ignore the most obvious source for the apparent
contradiction - the very book on which the movie was based -
in order to determine the facts.
Had they done so, the "physically
impossible act" would have shriveled up and disappeared long before
Mssrs.
Gannon and
Vicksell embarrassed themselves by touting
dubious conclusions from "experts" like Mr. Ball, and his
publisher, the notorious
Herr Zündel.
Did it never occur to these folks that there was a simple
explaination for this seeming contradiction? Did it never occur to
Ernst Zündel, or John Ball, or Messrs.
Gannon and
Vicksell, that a
quick reading of the book was in order before they assumed a
position built upon such shaky ground? Given the past performance
of these staunch propagandists, however, it is likely that at
least some of them were well aware of the explaination, and, as is
their practice, simply and contemptuously dismissed it, on the
(often correct) assumption that few if any of their targets would
bother to read the book, or even notice the explaination if
they did read the book. As this document shows, time and
again, this is not a far-fetched thesis.
[Continued]
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
The Techniques of Holocaust Denial
& "Revisionist Scholarship"