Originating Notice of Motion
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
ERNST ZÜNDEL APPLICANT -AND- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT ORIGINATING NOTICE OF MOTION YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED that ERNST ZÜNDEL will be making an
application to the Court, on a day and at a time and place to be set by the Court, for the
purpose of obtaining
(a) an Order in the nature of certiorari with prohibition in aid quashing the decision of
the Canadian Human Rights Commission under section 44 (3)(a) of the Canadian
Human Rights Act, 1976-77, c. 33, s. 1 (herein after called "the Act") to request the
President of the Human Rights Tribunal to appoint a Human Rights Tribunal to
inquire into two complaints laid against the applicant by Sabina Citron and the
Toronto Mayor's Committee on Community and Race Relations and prohibiting any
hearing before the Human Rights Tribunal on the said complaints; as beyond the
jurisdiction of Section 13(1) of the Act.
(b) relief under section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the
nature of certiorari with prohibition in aid;
(c) an Order for a stay of proceedings pending the determination of this judicial
review application, directing a stay of any inquiry by a Human Rights Tribunal under
the Act;
[page 2] (d) a Declaration pursuant to Section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms that the actions of the Canadian Human Rights Commission is in
contravention of Section 2(b) of the Charter and not a limit prescribed by law
pursuant to Section 1 of the Charter and permanently enjoining any further
proceeding upon the complaints referred to above;
(e) a Declaration that Section 13(1) of the Act is ultra vires the Parliament of Canada
pursuant to Section 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982 for breach of section 2(b) of the
Charter if section 13(1) applies in these circumstances, contrary to the above;
(f) such further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just.
The application is based on the following grounds:
(a) The passages complained of originate from and are exclusively contained in the
"Zündelsite", an Internet World Wide Web site located at Web Communications in Santa
Cruz, California, United States of America which website is created and operated by Dr.
Ingrid Rimland. The Canadian Human Rights Commission is acting in excess of
jurisdiction by claiming jurisdiction under section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act
over an Internet site located in the United States. These messages are not caused by nor
do they originate, wholly or in part, telephonically from a telecommunication facility
within the jurisdiction of Parliament.
(b) The Canadian Human Rights Commission is acting in excess of jurisdiction by
proceeding with complaints which are oppressive, vexatious and harassing in that they
are an attempt to silence the applicant's same views on World War II which have been the
subject of two criminal trials, one postal hearing and numerous requests for the laying of
false news and hate charges against him, all of which resulted in the finding that the
applicant's views on World War II do not constitute an incitement to hatred. The
complaints are vexatious, an abuse of process, and a violation of sections 2(b), 7, 12 and
15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and fall within the meaning of
subsections 41(b) and (d) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
(c) The Canadian Human Rights Commission is acting in excess of jurisdiction in that the
Internet does not fall within the purview of section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights
[page 3] Act, 1976-77, c. 33, s. 1. It is a unique, interactive communications medium which is
protected under section 2(b) and 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and
the Canadian Bill of Rights. If Section 13(1) of the Act can be so interpreted, this section
should be re-considered under section 52 of the Constitution Act of Canada as entirely
different than was considered in the Taylor case.
(d) That a reasonable apprehension of bias and abuse of discretion exists on the part of
the Canadian Human Rights Commission arising out of internal documents of the
Commission which reveal it prejudged or appeared to prejudge the applicant as a
"hatemonger," classified his writings as "Holocaust denial" which it judged to be "hate",
and made no effort to determine the truth or falsity or value of what it called "Holocaust
denial" before classifying it as falling within section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights
Act.
(e) The complaints are in violation of the Canadian Multiculturalism Act which the
Canadian Human Rights Commission is bound to enforce pursuant to section 3. The
statute requires all federal commissions and agencies to enhance and promote the
understanding of and respect for the ethnic diversity of the Canadian population. This
includes those of German ethnicity such as the applicant who bring a German viewpoint
to the discussion of World War II history. The Canadian Human Rights Commission is
violation both the Canadian Multiculturalism Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, section 27 and its own mandate to protect the human rights of all
Canadians, including Germans.
This application will be supported by the following material:
The affidavit of Dr. Ingrid Rimland.
The affidavit of Barbara Kulaszka.
Such further and other material as counsel may advise and the court permit.
[page 4] NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENTS: You are required to take cognizance of the within application for judicial review
and make opposition thereto in accordance with its terms and the appropriate provisions
of the Rules of this Court.
If you fail to do so, you will be subject to have such judgment given as the Court
may think just on the applicant's own showing.
Note: (1) Copies of the Rules of Court, information concerning the local offices of
the Court, and other necessary information may be obtained on application to the
Registry of this Court at Ottawa (telephone 613-992-4238) or at any local office thereof.
(2) This application for judicial review is filed by Douglas H. Christie of Victoria, British
Columbia, attorney or solicitor for the within name applicant.
DATED at Victoria, British Columbia, this 12th day of December, 1996.
[signed]
810 Courtney St.,
TO:
[
Legal Documents Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
filed by Douglas Christie
on December 12, 1996
TRIAL DIVISION
Douglas H. Christie,
Counsel for the Applicant
Victoria, B.C.
V8W 1C4
Phone: (604) 385-1022
Fax: (604) 479-3294
THE REGISTRAR OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION