Fallacy: Questionable Cause
This fallacy has the following general form:
The general idea behind this fallacy is that it is an error in
reasoning to conclude that one thing causes another simply because
the two are associated on a regular basis. More formally, this
fallacy is committed when it is concluded that A is the cause of B
simply because they are associated on a regular basis. The error
being made is that a causal conclusion is being drawn from
inadequate evidence.
The Questionable Cause Fallacy is actually a general type of
fallacy. Any causal fallacy that involves an error in a reasoning
due to a failure to adequately investigate the suspected cause is a
fallacy of this type. Thus, fallacies like
Post Hoc
and
Confusing Cause and Effect
are specific examples of the general Questionable Cause Fallacy.
Causal reasoning can be quite difficult since causation is a
rather complex philosophic issue. The complexity of causation is
briefly discussed in the context of the specific versions of this
fallacy.
The key to avoiding the Questionable Cause fallacy is to take due
care in drawing causal conclusions. This requires taking steps to
adequately investigate the phenomena in question as well using the
proper methods of careful investigation.
[
Previous
|
Index
|
Next
]
Description of Questionable Cause
Examples of Questionable Cause