Fallacy: Poisoning the Well
This sort of "reasoning" involves trying to discredit what
a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it
true or false) about the person. This "argument" has the
following form:
This sort of "reasoning" is obviously fallacious. The
person making such an attack is hoping that the unfavorable information
will bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they
will reject any claims he might make. However, merely presenting
unfavorable information about a person (even if it is true) hardly
counts as evidence against the claims he/she might make. This is
especially clear when Poisoning the Well is looked at as a form of ad
Homimem in which the attack is made prior to the person even making the
claim or claims. The following example clearly shows that this sort of
"reasoning" is quite poor.
Before Class:
During Class:
After Class:
[
Previous
|
Index
|
Next
]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Description of Poisoning the Well
Bill: "Boy, that professor is a real jerk. I think he is some sort of eurocentric fascist."
Jill: "Yeah."
Prof. Jones: "...and so we see that there was never any 'Golden
Age of Matriarchy' in 1895 in America."
Bill: "See what I mean?"
Jill: "Yeah. There must have been a Golden Age of Matriarchy,
since that jerk said there wasn't."
Examples of Poisoning the Well